The company's own plans do not matter, cannot matter, have never mattered.
The fact that they have the data, and that they operate in a jurisdiction where they can be compelled to turn over the data (and then gagged from saying what the government is now doing with the data), is all that matters. And that applies to both the US and China.
Pre-Snowden, I could imagine some people sticking their heads in the sand and pretending that stuff doesn't happen, or if it does, it doesn't happen here, or if it does, it doesn't happen often, or if it does, it happens with meaningful judicial oversight.
But the cat's well and truly out of the bag. Gathering data is equivalent to using it for evil, and we should (some of us do) treat every app that attempts to gather data, as evil. And we've long known that even approximate location data reveals plenty about who you associate with and what you do.
There is ZERO percent chance that NONE of the affected creators appealed their strikes.
YouTube was flooded with evidence that these clowns were pulling a fast one, and failed to comprehend it, for FOUR YEARS. That kind of negligence should open them to some sort of action as well.
"subsequent language updates can require today's developers to rewrite old code"
That's the definition of a failure by the language, and it's now a new language. It may share some semantics with the other language, but anyone trying to push breaking changes in the language itself should be seen as the enemy.
Sure, this keeps programmers employed, but everyone knows when they're doing a "bullshit job" that shouldn't even exist. Rewriting working code to satisfy a language wanker's vanity is the most bullshit job I can imagine. No wonder people quit over it.
The first time, it's a KLUDGE! The second, a trick. Later, it's a well-established technique! -- Mike Broido, Intermetrics