Comment Re:toast (Score 1) 156
Yeah, totally unprecedented....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Hey, our product is classified as a weapon by the US military....
Yeah, totally unprecedented....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Hey, our product is classified as a weapon by the US military....
Maybe not, but they do want to use the super advanced powerful a-awesome best AI that can do things like that when it's "without production classifiers" that make it safe.
Eric S. Raymond wrote "The Cathedral and the Bazaar", which inspired Mozilla to make their browser open source. For some reason, this means they name their extended support releases after him.
They presumed it dead because no one (in the scientific community) ever looked at it, even when it was "first" discovered.
There's a simpler explanation. The reef is named BSD.
Like Waymo, Tesla typically introduces robotaxis to a new city with a safety driver behind the wheel. Unlike Waymo, sometimes Tesla moves that person over to the passenger seat with access to a kill switch should anything go wrong. The company has been inconsistent in how it rolls out its robotaxis to new markets. The numbers go up and down, with zero explanation from the company as to why.
Sounds like Tesla is A/B testing their safety driver/person. Maybe the one on the passenger side doesn't actually have to know how to drive, or even have a license, just be able push a button. Which one sounds less expensive? Noting that simply pushing a "kill switch" won't help in an accident avoidance situation...
You still don't understand what model collapse is.
Is the person/committee who picked the newer private New Tab colors literally blind or just colorblind? They're horrible.
Sure, and we here on Slashdot are criticising the silly article. And I'm criticising your silly repeating of the silly claim that polarization is not a quantum phenomenon because you can "explain" it (in a very narrow energy range if you squint and don't look too close) using classical physics. I probably wouldn't have replied at all if you hadn't told one of your other replies "it's okay if you don't understand quantum mechanics."
The actual paper doesn't use "first quantum material" at all. It says "first class of room-temperature quantum materials that are intrinsically sensitive to the quantum statistical properties defining all forms of light". They actually write it all out twice, which suggests to me that they were aware that shortening it to "quantum material" would sound ridiculous.
In fact, on casual reading it appears to be a fancy polarizing filter that's also sensitive to coherence.
It's pretty straightforward. Instead of simple counting on your fingers you treat your right thumb as a 5, your left fingers as 10s and your left thumb as a 50, which lets you count to ten on one hand or a hundred on both. It's fairly obvious once you understand digital notation, but you could also teach the concept using it, just like an abacus.
If you really wanted to get carried away you could treat your fingers as binary digits and count to 1024.
The systems aren't creative they're just really really fancy search engines that regurgitate what they have ingested.
Are we still saying this? These systems have solved a wide variety of open math problems some of which were borderline famous.
But what are the practical implications of that? Isn't it just as likely that those math problems haven't been solved because there was not any particularly good reason to solve them?
'Dem goal posts are a walking.
Automatics are
This is a straight up lie. A lie promulgated by auto manufacturers to meet fuel efficiency standards, as well as to increase their revenues.
The truth: manuals get better mileage, last longer, and are cheaper to buy or replace the transmission.
Which manuals are more efficient than Toyota's Hybrid Synergy Drive?
I don't know of any hybrid vehicles ever available with a manual transmission, so you're trying to compare the efficiency of ICE vehicles vs. hybrid vehicles not manual vs automatic/CVT transmissions. Engine/motors and transmissions aren't the same things.
You can tell he's aware of the fact that stick driving results in more distractions, otherwise he wouldn't have typed out a whole paragraph with an irrelevant anecdote trying to convince himself otherwise.
Stick driving might make you feel "connected to the car" but it does distract you from the road.
I'm 63 and have always owned vehicles with a manual transmission and have never found it distracting, though perhaps a bit tedious in stop-and-go traffic. In any case, other may not be (more) distracted either. From Manual transmission enhances attention and driving performance of ADHD adolescent males: pilot study
Results: Subjectively, participants report being more attentive while driving in manual transmission mode. Objectively, participants drive safer in the manual transmission mode.
Conclusion: Although in need of replication, this pilot study suggests a behavioral intervention to improve driving performance among ADHD adolescents.
Referencing that study and pre-clinical reports ADHD and the Adolescent Driver: A Guide to Promoting Safety Behind the Wheel (bottom of article):
Teenagers with ADHD receive more moving vehicle violations (in particular, speeding tickets) than their non-ADHD counterparts.
There are studies demonstrating that driving with a manual transmission is more stimulating than with an automatic transmission. One pilot study involved 10 adolescents with ADHD who drove a virtual-reality driving simulator in both the automatic mode and the 4-speed manual mode at 8 pm and 11 pm.12 These participants reported being more alert when driving in manual mode; objective measures showed they drove more safely than with an automatic transmission.12
The pilot study was preceded by clinical reports of adolescents with ADHD who said they were less able to daydream when driving a manual transmission. For example, an adolescent reported, "If I don't pay attention to what I'm doing, the car will jerk and stall, and, boy, is that embarrassing."
I guess it really just depends on the person/driver...
Google: adhd manual transmission
The CD has been recontextualized from a functional audio format into an affordable collectible.
Don't play it too often, the laser will wear it out.
Even Toyota, Honda, and BMW have all reduced the number of cars for the U.S. market with a manual transmission, the article points out — leaving stick shift-loving Americans with a total of about 24 new-vehicle models to choose from.
I checked recently and Honda only has 2 models available with a manual transmission: Civic Type R ($47.400) and Civic Si ($31,500). The rest of their ICE vehicles are now only available with a CVT. Their hybrid vehicles come with their Two-Motor Hybrid-Electric Powertrain - which uses the electric propulsion motor at low-speeds and adds the ICE at highway speeds via a lockup clutch so there isn't really a transmission. The second (generator) motor and also ICE are used for charging the battery.
While I'd probably really enjoy the Civic Type R or Si, if I ever need/want to replace my 2001 Civic Ex (136k miles) or 2002 CR-V Ex (62k miles) - both manuals and in excellent condition - with another Honda, I'd probably get one of the hybrids as a dislike CVTs and their hybrid power-train seems better.
He's extremely loud and obnoxious.
And yet, not a Trump supporter.
(He says he neutral.)
The person who can smile when something goes wrong has thought of someone to blame it on.