Legumes, when they are pulses (i.e. dried), are parts of plants you can eat, sure, but no one will think of navy beans as "vegetables".
To the contrary. They are vegetables, and anybody who doesn't understand that they are vegetables is misled.
They get treated differently in a number of ways by nutritionists.
Show me one nutritionist-- one-- who says beans aren't vegetables.
The problem with the CIA is not necessarily that they exist, but that they apparently operate without oversight. What the fuck is this?
Isn't the FBI arresting him a form of oversight?
No, the reason the FBI arrested him was because the CIA reported him to them.
With the cutting off of the internet the videos of killings, dead bodies, and those begging and pleading with the US to intervene stopped coming out.
Are you a rsilvergun sock puppet or something? If you don't want AI search, just don't click on it.
It's getting damn near impossible to "just don't click on" AI; it's being stuck everywhere, whether we want it ot not. When I do a search, I want the search results, not a goddamn AI telling me what to think.
(Google searches keep getting worse. Now, likely as not, I get sites that don't contain your search term. Yes, even when I put the important terms in quotation marks.)
were you having problems understanding?
Nothing. It's just bullshit.
Exactly! Youtoob is bullshit.
If it's real, there's a link to an actual site with information
Unless the headline and quote massively mislead about the article, which becomes a “this site isn’t reliable” problem, there’s no need to-it’s *obviously* bullshit.
As I read that sentence, what I think what you just said is "right, I didn't read the article, I just guessed what it said from the headline."
If you think it just boils down to nothing more than a copyright claim, then you didn't watch the video.
What part of "don't ever use yootoob as a reference. Yootoob is for conspiracy garbage. If it's real, there's a link to an actual site with information" were you having problems understanding?
I could understand if they were just pacifists, but where were these guys when Google backed Russia's information warfare campaign in a US court?
First, we're discussing an article about employees at DeepMind in London, which, for reference, is not in the US, and has nothing to do with the case of US copyright violation that you posted the link to.
Second, don't ever use yootoob as a reference. Yootoob is for conspiracy garbage. If it's real, there's a link to an actual site with information.
Indeed I call bullshit on TFA
which you didn't read.
Your fallacy is False Dichotomy. Pointing out the stupidity in an ill-thought-out war does not imply agreeing with the Iranian regime or denying that it is bad or claiming that it is "an innocent place". If anything, the ill-though-out war has strengthened the control that the Iranian regime has over the Iran.
...and, for reference, I don't think I've ever seen the media portray Iran as "an innocent place." (They possibly could portray the Iranian people as innocent victims-- victims of both the regime and the American bombings, But mostly they don't.)
... seeing people root for the actual murderous theocrats. (Note for the slow - that would be Iran's mullahs.)
Found the bot!
For reference, Mr. Bot, your fallacy is False Dichotomy. Pointing out the stupidity in an ill-thought-out war does not imply agreeing or "rooting for" the Iranian regime.
If the natural monopolies on energy production are broken because now anyone can make their own energy at much lower cost, well that's communism.
:)
Anarchism, surely.
If you object, saying "but Columbia crashed on re-entry", fair enough; but then you will also have to count as failures missions where Falcon-9 failed attempted landings.
Where is Slashdot's libertarian streak in this headline? Shouldn't it be "In Wildly Massive Success Beyond All Realistic Expectations, Congress Finally Remembers the Fourth Amendment"?
It's common for
System going down at 1:45 this afternoon for disk crashing.
