Comment Re:"We're looking for what's verifiable." (Score 1) 60
Closer to the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy tradition. All they need are the words "Don't Panic" on the front cover.
Closer to the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy tradition. All they need are the words "Don't Panic" on the front cover.
If it doesn't, it has no real value.
Almost nothing on Wikipedia is true, but all of it is "verifiable" in that there's at least one published source making the claim. Even if 99.9% of all other sources say the opposite.
(The Haka is not, for example, a war chant. Which is attested to, but because it's claimed to be online, it is "verifiable".)
The number of errors is huge, the number of "official editors" who know anything about the subject is extremely small, and this has always been the case. This is why nobody reputable cites Wikipedia. Wikipedia is where you go to find out what is potentially interesting, but you ALWAYS obtain the facts from elsewhere, if you've any sense.
Your best engineers will be AuDHD, and AuDHD folk don't do well in these sorts of synthetic tests.
I can code in 20+ languages for over 12 different OS', write code that's good enough for CERN to run for particle accelerator data collection for a decade, have accelerated systems by an order of magnitude by understanding the poem space better than their previous engineers, but I am abysmal at exam style settings.
The software industry is riddled with SEs who write abysmal code but can pass a coding test easily. They're the folk that you have always needed to reject but didn't because they ticked a box.
The DOD/DOW have been working on this for a while. They discovered, early on, that the device had a propensity to cause permanent nerve damage.
It's very unlikely the US have fixed that, as they'd largely sidelined the work as a failure. However, at 36%, Trump needs something he can call a win, no matter what the long-term consequences.
The plan is to eliminate all government services that you use or depend on and replace them with a single check.
Eliminating government services is already being done without replacing them with a check, and it was being done well before UBI discussion became common.
More importantly, the same ones advocating for UBI aren't the same ones that are going to unleash DOGE onto the various government departments. They instead take the path of taxing the ultra-rich.
...Modern ejector seats cause spinal injuries from which full recovery is "unusual". Smashing the spines of pilots might not be the most effective way to boost morale.
$22,000 per hour. The F35 will be nearer $42,000 per hour. These are under-estimates, as they do not include price hikes, crashes that close businesses, crashing into businesses, crashing into heavily-populated sports centres, etc.
Cross it out with a sharpie instead. Because Sharipe gave trump something that it's in almost real gold, and it can even do his signature. And they gave it to him for nothing, even though the president of the states wanted to pay for it.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/live/b...
Plus, those sharpies have the power to deflect hurricanes when they're used on a weather map.
X-itter is specifically boosting certain types of content, which means it's more of a robber baron rather than a wild west.
Not to mention that it's currently run by a billionaire known for stealing people's ideas, who debuted a totally new salute that nobody has seen before.
People on ALL social media NEED to see what the other side says
I don't "need" to see people saying that Trump is a no-war president, only for those to later complain that Trump does the equivalent of doing wars on other countries.
I don't "need" to see that FEMA cuts are necessary, only for those to later be upset about not receiving the benefits from those cuts during a disaster.
I don't "need" to see a trump-supporting farmer upset that someone who allegedly connect them for $500,000, only to be later upset again that their own president pardoned the conman.
I do not need flip-flopping hypocrisy.
None of that is true. Grow up and learn how to understand and rate journalism. Start with Appling the spj code of ethics to media.
" Anyone who defends that is off the deep end self-deluding and in full on denial of reality. "
So you post a factual incorrect statement then call anyone with facts delusional. JFC, take some actual media course. Like, in a class room.
He's incapably of learning. I don't thing he has learned anything since 1980.
OFFS lease stop lying. You wither didn't read it, or didn't understand it.
Some of us remember when he was alive, and read went o to study him.
If you actually know what you were talking about, you would understand the difference between Marxist communism and socialism.
Liars like you have become tiresome.
Hackers of the world, unite!