Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:UK recommendations (Score 1) 34

1) Ask whether their body camera is working; it should be showing a blinking light
2) Ask: is this a stop search - the legal term that gives them the right to ask questions
3) If they affirm it is a stop search, ask them the basis for the stop. Three main excuses:

a) it's a airport - unlimited powers
b) there's a section 60 order in place; issued by a senior police officer, it allows anyone to be stop searched. Issued in a specific local area usually after a serious incident
c) otherwise there must be reasonable suspicion; the statement 'we're stopping everyone' will not do!

4) Look for other people to become witnesses.
5) After the event ask for a copy of the form that should have been generated.

If enough people resist to the maximum extent of the law, it forces them to behave better in the long term, though it can be problematic in the short term.

If enough people resist, they'll change the laws to make resistance a crime.

The US is already in a police state as enough Americans have accepted concentration camps, illegal detention, illegal deportation, deployment of the national guard against protesters, et al. Nor the arrest warrants for political opponents in Texas. Hell, you've got enough people defending this shit.

It's a bit late for civil resistance as they'll just demonise you as agitators on television (which they control, having cancelled Colbert) and say that enforcement was justified. Denounce anyone against them for their lack of patriotism.

You're pretty much at the point where you're hoping for a military coup as that seems to be the most bloodless option. Maybe a cabal of military officers will decide the constitution is more important than following orders.

First they came for the illegals, but I did not speak out because I wasn't an illegal.
Then they came for the immigrants, but I did not speak out because I wasn't an immigrant.
Then they came for the Liberals, but I did not speak out because I wasn't a Liberal.
Then they came for the Democrats, but I did not speak out because I wasn't a democrat. Then they came for me and there was no-one left to speak out for me.

Comment Re:At some point this will go disastrously wrong (Score 1) 76

All the moves Trump is making are not informed by any actual understanding of reality. So far, the ones he attacks manage to buffer the blows and find reasonable compromises grounded in reality. But at some point this will go really, really wrong. The thing the US already lost is being regarded as a reliable partner. That will long-term mean everybody will find other partners and it also means any "promised" investments in the US will be delayed, drawn out, made half-assed or plainly will not materialize, because they will be seen as sunk cost.

But at some point, Trump's approach (which cannot really be called a "strategy") will begin to fail. The US will lose access to some really needed medication, some important tech goods, or some important raw materials, and then it will look as weak as it has become and people will stop trying to accommodate its whims. In the "small world" real-estate Trump sort-of understands, that does not happen. But on a world stage, you have one party you deal with and 100 more that carefully watch and adjust their policies. Hence one weakness and you are done bullying "partners". And since Trump does understand almost nothing, he is sure to step into it pretty soon.

What will happen first is that things in the US will get expensive. Long before the shortages, shortages will be a result of people not being able to afford medication, food and fuel.

This will be good for the 1% in the short term but whilst wealth does not "trickle down", poverty certainly "trickles up". Ironic that the huge advantage early US industrialists had over Europeans is that they knew that they needed their workers to be able to afford to buy what they produced in order to make money.

Comment Re:3.5 years left (Score 1) 76

I'm sure many liberals, communists and moderates thought the same thing of the Brown Shirts in late Weimar Germany.

There was a very nasty surprise waiting for them. Once you gain the levers of power, and you are sufficiently motivated and unhinged from any kind of sense of obligation, decorum or constraint, you don't have to be a majority. You just have to be willing to use raw applications of power. Illegal immigrants are not the only people that are going to end up getting sent to Alligator Alcatraz. They're just the test subjects for the inevitable liquidation of all political opposition.

And Britain has to avoid the same thing with Nigel Farage.

If we cant avoid that horrible frog-faced pitfall we, as a nation, deserve to die.

Comment This seems exceptionally stupid... (Score 3, Interesting) 76

Even if you think that just shakedowning your way to foreign investment is a cool plan; why would you want a direct intel competitor to take a major stake in the company rather than just some unrelated capital-handling outfit?

Sure, 49% isn't a controlling share; but when Intel's current problems include technical deficiencies relative to TSMC and shareholders who want more shareholder value it doesn't seem like it would take much wheedling on TSMC's part to arrange a deal that looks like a shiny little technology transfer; but essentially involves having Intel management take an ax to their R&D and engineering capabilities in order to make line go up and keep shambling on as the discount brand to which TSMC transfers some of its older or less loved processes in order to get credit for 'investment'.

It's not clear that merely recapitalizing the company would necessarily fix it; but they'd either have to try to make it work or try to chop it up for finance meat; while TSMC is probably the single best-placed company to offer it a quick, easy, permanent position of inferiority; which seems like what you wouldn't want if you are trying to preserve or expand domestic capability.

Comment Re:A threat comparable to climate change you say? (Score 2) 10

A weird mixture of yes and no. People will absolutely lose their shit over 'the woke mind virus' turning frogs gay and filling every women's locker room with the trans menace; People will also dismiss the possibility that perhaps industrial quantities of novel endocrine disruptors might have an effect on humans as an alarmist con by scientists just in it to score those fat stacks of grant money.

In a related vein the only form of air pollution we will take seriously is 'chemtrails', the others are just communist hoaxes to Agenda 21 capitalism; and all vaccines will be presumed neurotoxic until further notice while it would be crass to note how many insecticides are nerve agents with familiar sounding mechanisms of action.

You know, rigorous intellectual consistency.

Comment Re:Pressurized sphere (Score 1) 116

Did. The pressurized space part of the Deepsea Challenger (as of the Trieste before her -- does English also use she for submarines?) was a pressure sphere at the bottom of the vessel.

Referring to ships, or in the case of submarines, boats, she is traditionally used; at least by sailors.

In naval parlance (at least British naval parlance) a boat is a vessel that can be carried by another larger vessel, a ship isn't. A boat can be carried by a ship, as most early subs were carried by ships the habit stuck and became tradition.

Comment Re:Pressurized sphere (Score 1) 116

Same with DSV Alvin (famed for studying the Titanic wreck) the crew compartment is a sphere because it's the most stable structure to resist pressure. It's possible to use other shapes, but less efficient meaning more material required to build, more weight, et al. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DSV_Alvin

Comment Re:Bureaucratic Bullshit (Score 1) 19

Please share how your IT organization goes through the process of identifying, correcting, documenting, testing and deploying security protocols and fixed but without having bureaucracy.

Now take all that and have it comply with public recordkeeping laws and procedures as well as government security protocols, which we all want government to "be accountable" right?

Fear will keep the local systems in line, fear of this battle station.

Comment Re:Slight price increase (Score 1) 30

My 5 year old Dell laptop recently wore out and shopping for a new one I was surprised how little, if any, specs have advanced for the same money (~$2k). In particular it doesn't look like anybody even makes a 15" 4k oled display any more. I suppose the chips are faster, so that's good, but the RAM, storage, and resolution are all about what they were.

I explicitly don't want 4K on a 15" screen. I don't even want it on a 17" screen. I suspect I'm not alone here as higher resolutions have meant that a lot of things have become too small to see comfortably. Also as a gamer, it takes a lot less GPU to run 1080p on a laptop. I think 4K screens have just become willy-waving, especially on laptops. Refresh rate is more important these days as a gamer, G2G times were always more important with LCD/LED screens.

The Asus I bought in 2022 still has at least 18 months good life left in it, especially as I only really use it for travel.

Slashdot Top Deals

Them as has, gets.

Working...