"Why this absolute pressure to trade nownowNOW?"
Because human beings have limited lifespan and no one really wants to work for the man. people want to have as much money as possible as fast as possible to exit the rat race and have their own kingdom as well. This is the basis of capitalism - greed.
But for every investor, there has to also be a speculator, otherwise, the transaction won't ever get made.
No, this is just not true. The market can work without speculators, with investors selling to each other. Why? Because some investors will need to sell their investments in order to consume the return, while others will defer consumption in order to invest. If Joe bought AAPL at $10 on 1990, and then Mary then bought it from him at $45 on 2005 and holds it to date, both Joe and Mary are investors, not speculator.
Many of us support the use of force to serve the public good, and feel that the public good is in fact the whole point of government and society.
I would not really disagree with either of those statements. However, in my considered opinion the initiation of force against non-aggressors never serves the public good. The purpose of government may indeed be to serve the public good, but I feel its fundamental nature as a legitimized aggressor can only serve to undermine that purpose.
I am not a utilitarian; I do not believe that it is possible to weight the benefits to some against involuntary costs imposed on others. The obvious corellary is that the only situation where the public good can be known to increase (ex ante, of course) is the one where all interaction is voluntary; the presence of any externalized cost whatsoever has the potential to completely nullify all possible benefit.
Why do you believe that you have an inherent right to not have to pay for damage that your actions cause?
Strawman argument. I never said I believed that. And I don't believe that. If I have to pay a carbon tax, then I will - I was just pointing-out the consequences.
Tax who? HFTs? Let's see what happens to spreads when you do that. Why... the spread would equal the tax. Regulate spreads? Why... HFTs just stop doing business. No trades until the spread narrows--but if you just delay trading until the spread narrows, you're really just hiding the spread behind a time delay.
No matter what happens, you pay more. There's smart regulation, and there's dumb regulation. Over-regulate, take all the new tech out of trading, and you bring us back to commissions measured as a percent of your trade! Examples of markets left in that backwater are physical commodities and real estate. Why? Because they aren't as liquid.
Signs of infection include a symbol with quadrants 1 through 4 as green red blue yellow.
That's not just AT&T. I have had both AT&T and Verizon -- even at the same time, when I had separate business and personal accounts -- and the coverage issue was equally sucky (just different at any given point in time). You learned when one phone was going to be better than another.
And the phones have a lot to do with it. The iPhone internal antenna must royally suck, because I can stand next to another AT&T customer who has a regular dumbphone: they might have four bars of signal strength while I only have one or two. Yeah, I've got antenna envy.
Fair enough, creators (and I'm using the term loosely, to account for musicians and car designers, and that's only two examples) have to get paid so their salaries must be included in the price of the copies of their creations. So, riddle me this: why do musicians not have a salary, and why do cars cost the same after enough cars have been sold to account for the salary of the designers?
I have never seen anything fill up a vacuum so fast and still suck. -- Rob Pike, on X.