The problem in this case is that Microsoft has a long and extremely well documented history of both of these things.

This is how literally all major markets work.

"Security weenies claim security via obscurity doesn't work, but it absolutely does if you like to use data and respect what it tells you. Check the number of security CVEs for operating systems like OpenVMS, MPE/IX, and see how they compare with Linux or Windows. By volume, the most popular OSes get the most attacks and successful exploits."

That is not security by obscurity. It's security by unpopularity.

Provide actual requirements. Object detection doesn't require a data center or a rack of GPUs. Other things might.

Oh look, coward does whataboutism.

Your best possible claim is that there are no good guys, which is accurate, but you're not even making it.

I doubt they used a single new technology or device to find this airman. There is satellite and AWACS coverage. Iran downed one but 2/3-3/4 of our AWACS are there.

Oh look, someone too cowardly not to post AC is too stupid to understand English. It's not even his first language and he's better at it than you are.

Uh, that's not even hard.

The way harder part is doing any meaningful sensing through the atmospheric disturbance at those speeds.

It's still too complicated for the average person.

That doesn't address how difficult it is to configure. Again, for a normal person who doesn't know what any of those settings mean. If you want normal people to be able to do this you're going to need to develop a config wizard for luci.

Then why did you say "The fact that these OSes allow even *root* to make changes to the OS, is insecure in itself" when root has access to rewrite the entire OS? Could it perhaps be because you don't know what you're talking about and you're casting around desperately to look like you do? Don't bother answering, it's obvious.

Oh nO NoT "CYBER" ImPLIcATIoNS

Get fucked, poser.

I hid it with the "Hide Google AI Overviews" extension, but I still see their crap at work.

Not only because the volume of data is smaller, but because the compute is local. Geosync RTT is 240–280 milliseconds. Earth-Moon RTT is 1250 ms. Earth-Mars is 6-40 *minutes*.

This insane take that compute shouldn't happen in space is only viable for LEO or latency insensitive use cases. We are going to put enormous amounts of compute in space, because we're going to need real-time compute far beyond LEO. johnjones is just an idiot spouting off in the interwebs and may be safely ignored.

You have to treat the plastic screen with more care than the modern glass screen.

It almost always gives shit answers. Any time I search for details of things I know about it jumps in to tell me some shit I know is wrong. Every. Fucking. Time.