Well, if only women could be more trustworthy, we might get rape convictions, and then more crimes would be reported and investigated. But unfortunately, as we all know, women don't know when they've been raped. That's a man's job to decide.
"Is it just to narrow the number of people who can replace them?"
The complete opposite. The thinking is that if you use a popular framework you can easily find talent who knows how your system works.
The fact that this breaks down when you have a website backed by 372 micro-services written in 7 different languages and that simple tasks like checking a log now require specific knowledge of additional tools is orthogonal to the original idea of having a platform with a large labor pool of people who require minimal onboarding.
If a search for "playdate" comes up with objectionable shit, that says a lot about how your behavior has driven your search algorithm.
The newspaper is founded by the same person who founded the Christian science movement.
Nope. But racism is Trump's North Star. If this were Russians coming in on H1B visas, we would not be having this discussion.
Sorry, meant to say, "all leveraged investment"
Sure. But by the GP's definition, all investment is gambling. There is no real distinction to be made about the asset, but instead about the individual risk profile.
Oh! I spotted the racist!
What do I win?
"[Racism] is right twice per day" is the phrase that comes to mind.
Every person making a down payment on a house is making the same decision.
I'm curious how they dealt with the fact the language changes over time. It makes sense that people writing after AI would write more like an AI than people from before AI.
When you don't know what to do, walk fast and look worried.
