Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Choice? This guy's a hack. (Score 1) 103

Calculations based on average price of fuel + average household fuel use - public data. Those figures matched my experience of having an 1800sqft house with an oil burner heater in upstate NY some years ago when heating oil was about half as much as it is now (actually, a bit lower, but then my furnace was old - not that you can really fudge much efficiency out of these things, they're pretty efficient).

Comment Choice? This guy's a hack. (Score 4, Informative) 103

Perspective is important. It's an extrapolated figure, based on trace-element factors for Cd, Cr, Mn, Ni, but not lead. That seems incredibly dishonest.

What's more, they report 0.86–1.70 ng/m ambient lead level... which upon brief examination, is about 1/4th the average urban ambient lead level, and from what I'm able to determine, about 20% of the EPA 2022–2024 non-source Pb-TSP daily mean. In other words, it's significantly lower than sources with known lead. (Similarly, it's about ~20% of historic ambient national levels - couldn't find date later than 2019 for this.)

Looks like they played very Orwellian with their data interpretation. "The use of wood as an energy source is a relic of the past, one that should not be relived if given a choice." is... well. This is "let them eat cake" level hubris. Whoever said this either has a disdain for the people they're's studying, or have zero economic understanding.... and based on the actual study findings, I can't say it appears to be truthful, either.

The people who burn wood are not doing it out of personal preference. They're doing because they can afford it: they have no other choice. Chopping, splitting, drying, and burning wood is a labor intensive activity. It's done out of fiscal/economic necessity: fuel prices for heating are extremely high, and in the area they sampled, they rely primarily on heating oil (basically: diesel fuel). Even last winter, the average household heating cost was about $1800/month, about twice what it was in 2015. With fuel prices surging? You can effectively expect twice that cost (or more) this coming winter due to the conflict with Iran.

Musing: Were the lead actually higher in the area (from what I can tell, it's not), I wonder if the "high" lead in the air would be representative of "carbon sequestration" of the trees over the past 70 odd years: as they grew, they absorbed the lead in the air?

Comment Re:100% understandable (Score 1) 106

That's a symptom of economies of scale, and excessive de-industrializing regulation. Nuke plants have been a one-off, unique design with little reproduced between them. When they have been built in recent memory, it's been with 1950s technology.

If we instead institutionally embraced newer (safer, cheaper) reactor designs and built them at scale (with industrialized QA), we'd have safe, clean nuclear power for 200 years+ in the US, just using the existing nuclear waste.

Comment Re:If it's free, you are the product (Score 2) 94

I've got less than a year of email locally in Thunderbird for one mail account and it tops 10GB.

I think you underestimate the amount of space files can take: attached files take up a lot. What do I do with that email, delete it? That's not a workable solution if I want to retain the metadata associated with the files (which I do).

Comment Now... (Score 3, Insightful) 29

...if only our legal system was that stringent?

Ban on practicing law for a year if your submission to the court includes AI slop, how about that?
A second offense, disbarment.

(Personally I think disbarment should be a first-offense result for an ostensibly high-competence field like law, but our society has gotten away from "consequences" for "easily predictable results of ones actions" in general...)

Comment Re: Certainly more useful (Score 1) 98

That's not an apt comparison, since bikes don't have an auto shifter. They don't even have a dry clutch like cars do - they have a wet clutch, which enables you to do things like ease or slam in and out of a gear while accelerating or deaccelerating, which is like 50% of the riding experience: it allows for launch, wheelies, better corner control, wheel-on-pavement control, and so on, depending on what you're trying to do.

Same reason why driving a shitbox honda civic with a manual is many times more fun than driving a newer vehicle with more HP and better handling, which is a smooth auto. It actually takes skill to do well, and that makes it fun.

And, to play devil's advocate, most cars nowadays also have the ability to pick a specific auto-clutched gear with the auto gearbox: you can go from first, to 2nd, or if you want, accelerate into 2nd from third and back to third for a bit of a launch. Not only is this more fun, it's extremely useful for controlling the vehicle on winding hill grades and bad weather driving: you use the gear ratio and the rolling resistance (while improving fuel economy) instead of the brakes on the downside of the hill - similar energetic effect as "reactive charging brakes", but less likely to send you to the ditch on an icy road.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Being against torture ought to be sort of a multipartisan thing." -- Karl Lehenbauer, as amended by Jeff Daiell, a Libertarian

Working...