Comment Re: Mixed feelings. (Score 1) 49
If they don't have admin/root rights on their own machine... more is the pity.
If they don't have admin/root rights on their own machine... more is the pity.
If a Meta employee hasn't figured out how to use an intervening device driver with a random number generator-with-timer, maybe another gig is in order.
I believe in human rights, too. But any good hacker has sufficient skill to thwart such madness whilst still doing their job. Oh, and I'll be there's an AI vibe code generator they could use with but one token to get the job done.
I've been a CLI coder for decades. Mouse use mostly gets in my way.
The trouble with Transhumanists is that they all imagine there will eventually be only one human per company with an army of AI's to do the work.
But they all think they'll be that one person.
Also, they're insane.
Boogergooks.
They've never met 7th Grade boys, have they?
At least some of this will be stress. If you're enjoying something, then you won't be stressed. If you're feeling positive and delighting in what you do, then you won't be stressed in unhealthy ways. This looks similar to the Mozart Effect, which turned out to be that if you liked something, your brain functioned better.
Yes, charging around the stage playing rock music isn't exactly gentle, but it IS extremely good exercise for the heart and the rest of the body. Again, that's going to have positive effects.
(We can ignore Keith Richards in this model, as he's older than the universe and only created it as a place to store his guitars.)
When CUDA started taking off we had ATI hardware, to support their open source pledge, and looked into ROCm.
Just getting the drivers to build on EL-anything was an extreme effort, and it wasn't my first rodeo.
Without betraying confidences, I was told second-hand that there were only ten people on the GPU driver team across all platforms and that they were doing their best and not sleeping enough as it was, with Compute way behind gaming bugs on the priority list.
I couldn't independently verify of course but the theory fit the data.
I immediately empathized with the suffering of the devs and went out and bought nVidia cards, annoying binary drivers and all.
Since then I've felt like that some bean counter at AMD wrote nVidia a trillion dollar check.
If you're not a tiny company *overstaff* your engineering departments so you don't miss new opportunities as they arise. The opportunity costs exceed the opex costs.
Same here but this lack of support will matter much less than dropping i486.
There are still embedded systems sold today that only meet i486 specs. I don't use them but some industries do.
Sure a $12 ESP32 can handle those tasks but it's a revalidation thing.
Not that anybody from those vendors stepped forward to maintain a tree.
OTR might be small enough.
The Axolotl Ratchet is much better but perhaps too big for SMS.
TextSecure probably would have offered it were that feasible.
Of course if you can arrange one-time pads you're 1:1 at 140 characters.
Really this is far more probable than a dozen people went crazy in the same way at the same time which seems to be a plurality of comments.
If there's an American great ape they live in Washington state, not Ohio, based on report frequency.
Star Wars nerds? Yes, so many in Ohio.
His best buddy specialized in making exploding pagers.
Good luck out there.
In my younger and more foolish days I had a Pontiac and I opted out with wire cutters to the Surveillance module's power cables.
At the time I was actually more concerned with remote unlock hijacking than tracking but still I didn't trust GM.
All together now: WE TOLD YOU SO.
If I had to guess 20 years later doing that would disable the ECU.
Most posters seem to be assuming it's a scam. I can't possibly think of a reason why they might think that. (A few million, yes, but getting it down to one is hard.)
However, that's almost by the by. It's rated for 5G. 5G is old. 6G is the new standard and WiFi 6 has been around for a while now. If you're actually serious about designing a new phone from scratch, and have not yet released it, you'd almost certainly want it to be 6G-capable. Nobody in their right minds designs for yesterday's standards, when they're going to be competing with tomorrow's products.
This, to me, is far far more important than whether or not it is real. If you're designing a product for a market that's on its way out, you've got a serious problem. If you're clamouring for a product that's designed for a standard that could be phased out by the time you see it, then you're not thinking straight.
Why does this matter, if the product isn't real anyway? First, we don't know it's not real, we shouldn't assume that. But, second, it means that nobody thought it was worth bothering with taking the potential customers seriously. The customers are merely meat with cash. That's not an attitude I can respect. Whichever vendor is making these phones is worthy only of my utmost contempt.
The problem isn't the population. Bedrock can handle more than that. London isn't sinking because of all the people (and London is huge!), it's sinking because the ice sheet that pressed the Highlands deep into the crust has been gone for the last 10,000 years, resulting in the entire island tilting back to where it naturally should be. You could move London's population into the Great Glen and it would not make the slightest difference - London would still be sinking. The ice sheets were a whole lot heavier than a few tens of millions of people.
(Ok, it would make a difference. If the rich people actually lived in Scotland, the transit system and public services would see a thousand percent improvement inside a week. If they were also forced to speak Gaelic, English would vanish in a month.)
Aquifers can be deep. The aquifer that supplies the town of Buxton in England is so deep that it takes rainfall 5,000 years to rech it.
Every place? Fascinating.
There are towns in England and Wales that have been occupied for the past 10,000 years. Manchester isn't the greatest place on Earth, but I'm really not convinced it's going to start sinking into the ground any time in the next thousand years. If "short term" is longer than the remaining lifespan of the human race, I am not convinced "short" is really the right word.
"Short term" is only meaningful if it's shorter than the time needed to take meaningful remedial action, and the time it would take to remediate the problem in Mexico City vastly exceeds the time it will take for the city to crumble into oblivion.
The sun will not explode in 4 billion years. It's far too small. It might well run out of hydrogen by then, but that will simply cause it to swell. If, in four billion years, we can't find a way to drift the Earth outwards to remain within the goldilocks zone, then we're a failure as a species. Of course, we might well have built a Dyson Ring by then. Although, to be honest, if we were going to do that, we'd want to find a gas cloud that was about to form a stellar nursary and head there. If we arrive as the proto star fires up, we've maximum resources in the easiest possible form (a dust cloud, so no mining needed and minimal processing required), can build the Dyson Ring or Dyson Sphere by the time the star really gets going, and have another ten to fifteen billion years.
The rule on staying alive as a program manager is to give 'em a number or give 'em a date, but never give 'em both at once.