There's a lot of info available about attack mitigation (or just hungry crawlers) and how to avoid/blackhole them. Problem is, you have to have control of portions of the network stack to do them effectively.

Security through obscurity only works so long as you can be obscure, which is part of the vibe of the post. It's really stressful sometimes, depending on what's hosted.

Of the sites I don't have behind Cloudflare, the assets aren't worth anything and I truly don't care if they show up in AI. Otherwise, what's mine is mine, and not theirs.

If you can afford it, also consider Cloudflare; their bot identification is really good. You can use defaults or make your own filters. They're not the only ones that do this, but my experience with them has been positive. Much depends on your skills in how the web actually works, network + site interaction.

Their protections are cheap for the quality/speed. All of the large sites I manage are behind Cloudflare, including their DNS. Their DNS management is superior, and has interesting tricks for mixed-media sites. I don't work for either of these companies.

Get Wordfence if your site is Wordpress. The controls inside (free version) are enough to rate-limit crawlers effectively.

If you don't have Wordpress, your choices are more complex; you MUST use an IP filtering system and front-end your site with it to rate-limit everyone methodically. Crawlers eventually quite.

Many crawlers identify themselves in the get/post sequence. You have to parse those. If you understand fail2ban conceptually, it's the method used to create like-type gets that score with higher rates, and folder transversals. Accumulate your list and band them/null-route/block or whatever your framework permits.

Yes, you can blackhole through various famous time-wasters, but this also dogs your site performance. Captcha and others are becoming easier to fool, and for this reason, they're not a good strategy.

Once you decide on a filtering strategy, monitor it. Then share your IP ban list with others. Ban the entire CIDR block, because crawlers will attack using randomized IPs within their block. If you get actual customers/viewers, monitor your complaint box and put them on your exemption list.

There is a difference between "secret" and "Don't Crawl Our Site".

It's almost impossible to masquerade as a human; even throttled crawlers are easily identifiable through many different and often evil traits used.

The kleptocracy of AI (and other) crawlers is what's at issue.

Hydrogen does not make a good fuel, tor a tonne of reasons, but nitrogen fuel would be less prone to nasty reactions and fewer problems. Could N6 combustion be controlled at levels suitable for heavy road vehicles or trains?

(Electric trains have their own problems, due to the fact that the junction needs to be poor and the cost of copper is so great that lines need to use far worse conductors to reduce theft.)

Alphabet can absorb way more fines than prison sentences.

Hopefully they won't be Evil.

The entire post is a B-Movie, save the misunderstood public danger from just crappy construction. I wonder what else they'll find.

Marvel should get the rights. Maybe a Disney movie about WaspMan, to compete with the aging and tired Spiderman franchise.

While no one was looking, apparently, there was other news, like CPB going dark and Tesla being fined nearly a quarter billion dollars in liability due to premature auto-driving feature use.

But no, wasps. Radioactive wasps.

Since we're not taking about infinitesimals, I fail to see the relevance.

The Earth's magnetic field is weakening which is measurable by the accelerating traversal of the magnetic poles. That's why a relatively small CME last year caused the same Northern Lights all the way down to Hawaii as the Carrington Event which was 10x stronger. The beauty is unquestionable but the impacts will cause us difficulty.

There was a recent solar storm which ionized the atmosphere more than we are used to as "normal" in our recent history, which sets up the conditions for lightning to travel further. The physics on it are pretty simple with all variables considered.

We're going to see more of these than we're used to as the pole shift continues to accelerate.

This happens every 6000 years or so and we're right on schedule but we're really unprepared to handle it. Preparing for this ought to be a planet-wide project for our species, and to help out the other species that rely on geomagnetic migration for their reproductive success.

As a kid in the 80's we only needed to update our compass calculations for variance to True North every 20 years or so; now it's yearly.

I wish Humanity could not plant their heads in the sand on this one but I'm planning like we will.

Yes, it's quite rare that a Congressman's constituents are his voters.

Maybe a dozen, max.

Yet incumbents win reelection 92 % of the time.

We also have the government we deserve.

You are correct. That's precisely how MWI is thought to work.

The premise of the argument is that, to conserve superposition information, you would necessarily need to prove that it would be grouped with information QM requires to be conserved, when viewed in a space that permitted it to be conserved. If it isn't, then there's no mechanism to preserve it, so no MWI.

No, because the paradox relies on infinitesimals, which have no cogmate in the material world.

Not strictly correct. You would be correct for all consequences over any statistically significant timeframe, but (a) I've purposefully included things that aren't actually outcomes, and (b) over extremely short timeframes (femtoseconds and attoseconds), differences would emerge very briefly, because different mechanisms take different routes.

Remember, the maths only concerns itself with outcomes, not the path taken, so identical maths will be inevitable for non-identical paths.

Just for history's sake, it's obvious that mimicking these cavities on a nanoscale chip could be very useful in optical computing.

Hello, future archive.org viewer.

> It also has its own NIC.

Now the story makes sense.

Thank you for the important context.