Yes, exactly. DST came about because there were issues to be solved. Apart from sleep there is also recreation and having an additional hour to socialize with people which also mean there are a bunch of businesses that operate primarily in this time. We can also talk about traffic issue and the sun being in a different position when they are driving.

I think what we're looking at is the short sighted stupidity of emotional retarded people who's version of thinking is yelling at people to support an idea they are too cognitively lazy to consider for themselves.

Yeah humid here like that too. Often 35C (about 95F) at midnight, those nights play havoc with people's sleep. You just can't sleep and live in AC constantly so as much dark as possible is needed to make up for that just so you can open the windows and get some fresh air at night.

With the stupidity of loosing DST the tradies would start in the morning when it is finally cool enough to get some decent sleep for a few hours. I can think of other reasons to keep DST however sleep would be the main one. With DST it's some help in getting sleep and that hour makes the difference between functional and fatigued, between getting home or having a car accident.

Unless, of course these morons are proposing to add a legally mandated afternoon siesta to their proposal.

Management paid little attention to dates in the 20th century does anyone seriously think they will pay attention to a leap hour as an edge case for time? I'm gonna have to get more popcorn. Obviously the issue is because software is still made as cheaply as possible and even with the subject of time right in their face they still don't code to handle it. So let's abolish accuracy and assume the earth is always the same size - slaps forehead.

Maybe 360 days would make it nice and round.

Fuck it - let's go epoch time all around the world no more DST, no stupid 720 degree clock or timezones. While we're at it - let's get rid of days of the week, month and years as well. It's 1791452533 right now, I'll see you at 1791452533.

I'd say another drawback to getting rid DST is that any tradesman working outside would have to start banging hammers an hour earlier to miss the heat of the day waking people up whilst construction projects miss an hour per day, per person, per project because exhaustion leads to fatal work accidents.

Then there is the additional energy consumption required for lighting in the evening that would have been provided by the sun for free.

I'm starting to see just how complex this is all going to be and that the only thing worse than daylight savings is not having daylight savings.

As impressive as it is there is no abort capability for starship and the technology for seats that gimbal through the flip maneuver still don't exist. Falcon's retirement also retires the dragon which is the only proven functional human rated capsule in exchange for Boeing's Starliner and, well we all know just how good that is. Unless of course NASA wants to ask Russia to take American astronauts to ISS.

Then again the only realistically viable lunar lander is Alpaca which by-passes many of the issue both Blue Origin and SpaceX has with their landers. So, IMO, I think there are some compelling arguments to keeping Falcon if America wants to beat China back to the moon who, in reality, are starting to look like they will get back there first.

Of course SLS Block 1B could do the entire thing in single launch IF NASA could afford the tower upgrades.

How does materials change orbital phenomenon?

By far, with all these new mega constellations the biggest risk we face is from the Kessler syndrome from which there will be no way back and end any ambitions for human space exploration for thousands of years.

It would be worthwhile to have tight international regulation as it is the one interest that all countries share.

This will be the next frontier, the question is what happens when you keep pumping heat into them. I wonder what will it to to infrared astronomy? Also, electronics will have to stay inside the Van Alan belt, so it will be interesting how the issue of cosmic radiation flipping bits will be handled.

They're too busy eating all the kumquats off my fruit trees to make any noise. If you said Kookaburras then it might be a different story.

Also Birds. I prefer to have birds around than stupid drones delivering shit. The only consideration is if it uses less fuel energy than a driver with a truck full of parcels.

Eagles in Australia are known to attack and disable drones and are notoriously territorial, big, dangerous, fucking awesome and a protected species - meaning you are liable if your drone hurts one whilst it is attacking your drone.

In Australia it could cause a bush fire - so you've actually raised a very valid safety concern.

You mean plankton and zooplankton isn't there bro.

Mom it's a floordrobe!

It bio-accumulates. Radio-isotopes mimic micro-nutrients and are used by the body of plants and animals until they are eaten by something else.

Which is how people accumulate radio-isotopes in the body because it is humans on the top of the food chain. After that it takes about 6 years of internal radiation exposure for body tissues to gestate a tumor. Plutonium Chloride is really good at creating leukemia because it looks like iron to the body and readily absorbed by people.

When the animal (or human) dies the radio-isotope is returned to the environment to begin the cycle again until it goes through enough half-lives to decay energetically.