Comment Technicality (Score 5, Interesting) 97
The case was won on a technicality. The core issue was never really addressed.
The case was won on a technicality. The core issue was never really addressed.
Other than MBAs, I can't think anyone with a masters... If you aren't going to make PhD at Standford, Harvard, etc. in the hard sciences, they give you a masters and tell you "nice try, now please move along." People either do a PhD (free because you are teaching or doing research) or start working after their BS. After four years of undergrad, you should have the tools you need. If you don't know something, you should be able to quickly teach yourself. A PhD means you can say you are the world's leading expert in something very narrow, and you were the the first person to find/discover/explain/prove/etc. something new. Very cool!
Someone is anthropomorphizing.
Jensen Huang to college grads: "Run. Don't walk" toward AI
https://www.axios.com/2026/05/...
Nvidia founder and CEO Jensen Huang told graduates at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh yesterday that demand for AI infrastructure is creating a "once-in-a-generation opportunity to reindustrialize America and restore the nation's capacity to build."
Why it matters: With many college grads fearing AI could obliterate their career dreams, Huang pointed to boundless opportunity as a "new industry is being born. A new era of science and discovery is beginning
Nvidia, which makes AI chips, is the world's most valuable company. Huang told 5,800 recipients of undergraduate and graduate degrees that the AI buildout will require plumbers, electricians, ironworkers, and builders for chip factories, data centers and advanced manufacturing facilities.
"No generation has entered the world with more powerful tools â" or greater opportunities â" than you," he said. "We are all standing at the same starting line. This is your moment to help shape what comes next. So run. Don't walk."
"Every major technological revolution in history created fear alongside opportunity," Huang added. "When society engages technology openly, responsibly, and optimistically, we expand human potential far more than we diminish it."
Full speech: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
This is a good way to grow. The old "the first hit is free" model. However, in this scenario, the AI companies should give their product away for free and recognize no revenue. They can report active users per month or something similar. Subsiding the sales and then recognizing the revenue feels like fraud.
...like "Tell me about Tiananmen Square" or "Tell me about Xinjiang".
Is this what you want for the future?
My thoughts back when R1 came out:
Does it really take $1.25 billion in opex to give away $9 billion? WOW!
$1.25 billion get you 5,000 employees making 250k each. At a charity???? (I know. There is also coffee, insurance, rent, lawyers, etc.)
Who on earth is running this place? Oh. Wait...
It's genius. Say the product is too dangerous, and you can't have it. Have the few people who actual touch it sign NDAs.
Sit back watch the news go wild.
Company valuation jumps.
The CIA is running Chinese language ads looking for spies.
https://www.theguardian.com/us...
The US will pay very good money for secrets.
These guys could have quietly cut a deal with the NSA/CIA. Now that China knows to look for them, they better watch their backs. Talk about poking the dragon.
those in power will want it to go away.
It might take one person one year to write 25k lines. How does a person get their head around that in 15 hours? One little "why on earth is this here" question can generate an hour or more in research with product managers, asking developers, reading 1000's of pages of documentation.... If it is fintech quant code, good luck with finding a quick explanation.
"I've got some amyls. We could either party later or, like, start his heart." -- "Cheech and Chong's Next Movie"