You know that French was literally **banned** in Louisiana by a constitutional amendment until 1974, right? Children caught speaking French even faced corporal punishment in schools. So rag about "whiney Frenchies" all you want, but attempts to stamp out French language and culture in North America were very much real until very recently. The French explored most of North America and set up settlements across the continent by the early 1700s, and many places still carry anglicized French names. However, the English scored a decisive victory taking out the French army in North America in 1759, over 100 years before the US Civil War FWIW. The Cajuns didn't start out in Louisiana; they were forcibly deported there by the British. A funny thing happens when you oppress a population for a few hundred years; they tend to remember that oppression:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
So while we bend over backwards to accommodate Spanish speakers today, that courtesy was absolutely not extended to the French that had been here from 1599 onwards, 8 years before the English in Jamestown.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Granted, the French lost the war, and to the victors go the spoils, but the English and French had a long history of war back in Europe, and that meant the French in North America were treated as 2nd class citizens.
Now, I disagree with forcing prioritization of French programming, and I also disagree with language laws in Quebec that restrict the use of English, but I think it's fine to ask that French content at a minimum be featured on the platforms. It doesn't change the complicated history of French in North America, but if we're going to be supportive of Spanish speakers in North America, why wouldn’t we also be supportive of French speakers who were here before the English?