Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Compare cell phone plans using Wirefly's innovative plan comparison tool ×

Comment Bill Nye is not a science guy. (Score -1, Flamebait) 409

"Our favorite science guy?"

WTF is this, reddit? Goddamn slashdot's gone to shit. I mean, it's gone to shit several, several times since I started posting here, but every time I keep thinking we've hit bottom, no the editors find a way to dig deeper.

Comment Re:Public Relations (Score 1) 301

Not to get them to stop looking at wikileaks, no, but to:

1. Change the topic of conversation from the DNC's dirty laundry to "WikiLeaks is evil." Similar to the "Russians did it," "Trump's a Putin plant," "everyone clutch pearls because an evil foreign government is influencing our elections even though we're just guessing about that" narratives. Spam the news with anything other than the content of the leaks themselves.

2. Poison people against future releases from WikiLeaks. The Hillary campaign has already stated that the next leak will contain "falsified information." How they know...who knows? But it's all about establishing doubt and generally discrediting the source. After all, if wikileaks is evil because gays and cancer patients, who's to say they wouldn't fake stuff now?

3. In the long term the establishment wants WikiLeaks and Assange, gone. Anything that can be done to discredit, slander, malign, and generally make them lose support serves that end. If nobody likes WikiLeaks anymore then few will care when the next "cat burglar" makes it through.

What do you think the purpose of writing this story was? Now, a year after the events? Just to casually inform people of old news? It's not like there's any new information here, or new developments in the story. It's almost as if the point of the story isn't to inform you of the news, but is to shape the public's opinion of WikiLeaks. Naw, that can't be it. That would make our news media propaganda, and that's crazy conspiracy talk! You're smarter than that, aren't you?

Comment Re:Criminal (Score 1) 301

It doesn't have to be a crime to be interesting information. I was most interested in all the collusion between the DNC and the mainstream media. For instance, watchers of Morning Joe noted that Joe and Mika had been fair with Trump throughout the campaign. Then all of a sudden they just start shitting on him non-stop. Then we see from the leaks that Debbie Wassermann-Schultz sent a nasty email to the MSNBC producers that Joe needs to fall in line just before that shift in tone happened. Just further confirmation our media is simply propaganda.

Comment Re:Gotta love the hypocrisy (Score 2) 332

Well, if you trace the origin of the neocon ideology it's ex-Trotskyites who wanted a more aggressive foreign policy (see Bill Kristol's dad).

The problem we have now is "what happens when social experiments fail?"

Neocons want interventionist war in the middle east. Fails. Solution: more war in the middle east.

Progressives want welfare state. Destroys black families, traps them in generational poverty. Solution: more social programs.

It's really, really hard for anybody to say "ya know, if we're in a hole, maybe we should stop digging?"

Slashdot Top Deals

The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the pavement is precisely 1 bananosecond.

Working...