Who died? How can you not know? Have you done any research at all before forming an opinion of what did or did not happen?

The source is the mouth of the Mayor President of Ceuta during his address to the EU parliament on Aug 6th.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Or if you prefer second hand press sources:

https://www.bbc.com/news/artic...
https://www.dw.com/en/ceuta-le...

I'm sorry I have no clue what you are trying to say. What was the point of the statement "In no time, pretty much all those who had crossed were back in Morocco and everything was back to normal." ? What did you intend to convey by this that is actually consistent with the facts of what took place?

Putler also doesn't believe Russia's borders end anywhere.

The entire point of a state that governs itself with the consent of its citizens is advancement of the interests of the citizens of that state. It isn't fighting global inequality or advancing the interests of those in other states at the expense of their own.

Unconstrained immigration is almost always a bad idea. It leads to failed integration, ghettoization, prejudice and resentment. This issue is turbo charging the rise of right wing politics throughout Europe.

Spain has a population of 50 million. They should have sent required forces to Ceuta to block or interdict the invasion well in advance and made its intentions known.

Are you seriously asking why it matter that weakness is getting people killed? The trigger for this was a seemingly permissive supreme court ruling in Spain. Merkel for her part intentionally lit up a neon sign both showings of weakness resulted in needless death. If people know they will not be allowed to invade they won't bother to go in the first place which is the best scenario for everyone.

You come in force and physically stop them and provide suitable transportation back to where they came from. More importantly is to make it known you won't tolerate invasion in advance so this shit doesn't take place to begin with.

Did you learn nothing from Merkel who got thousands of people killed with her come to Germany stunt in 2015? Weakness gets people killed, in this particular case over 100 people died to say nothing of a terrorized local population.

Jesus Christ, WTF are you talking about? Over 100 people are dead.

The AP is irrelevant in all of this. Certificate validation occurs between the EAP server and supplicant. When the server is done it furnishes encryption keys to the AP for it to use.

The supplicant uses its trust anchor to validate the cert the same way any web browser would. The real problem is having a valid cert is completely meaningless because its identity is tied to nothing not even the SSID of whatever you are connecting to.

This solves nothing because anyone (including Defcon attendees) can obtain a valid certificate. What what is needed are secure authentication algorithms rather than endless parades of absurd band-aids that only make the lack of secure authentication even worse.

Using existing infrastructure and code one could do this quite easily using a PAKE rather than certificates for mutual authentication within EAP-TLS.

Where are you getting this? Press accounts are stating use of outdated data not AI.

I don't understand why it would be necessary to use "AI" rather than deterministic algorithms. All you are doing is calculating state vectors and telling people what to do to accomplish a preprogrammed goal.

ATC should be completely automated and VHF radios replaced with CPDLC. There is no reason for humans to be manually executing algorithms a computer can do perfectly 100% of the time. Way past time to get rid of the entrenched interests with their blah blah blah.

This technology is an unusable insecure clusterfuck. Unlike normal secure sites linked to DNS names cert identities are pointless indicators of nothing. For it to be secure you have to constrain both certificate identity and issuer which in the real world will only ever happen if your supplicant is provisioned by an administrator. Without it WPA-Enterprise is completely insecure. Most supplicants will gladly connect without proper verification and not so much as issue a warning while doing so.

Yes, same in the US. I rarely take a radio with me for this reason. If I have one I have to monitor 16 which I'm not going to do on a crowded lake.

The other interesting bit about the radios is you need a license to operate it on land however step one foot on a boat and the license requirement vanishes.

The Shah was in power the whole time as he had been for the preceding dozen years already. According to article 46 of their own constitution hiring and firing of ministers is by royal decree. Not only was nobody restored to power the Shah had the power to fire Mossadegh at his leisure and exercised it while still the king in a letter on Aug 15 1953 as Mossadegh was actively perusing a coup to install himself as dictator. It gets worse because the only person with authority to hire Mossadegh is ... drumroll... the Shah himself who had merely rubber stamped a decision of parliament (e.g. "democratic election"). The whole democratic and overthrow narratives are patently absurd on their face being at odds with trivially checkable facts.

Operation Ajax was an inept propaganda campaign. They bought radio ads, printed posters and paid people to go in the streets and shit on Mossadegh. It didn't do shit and the CIA itself pulled the plug on it for that reason. The Shah won the legitimacy contest between himself and Mossadegh on the 15th and 19th of Aug '53 because he had more popular support and support within institutions of hard power.

Meanwhile confusing Mossadegh with democracy would be funny if it were not so ass backwards.

"A plebiscite more fantastic and farcical than any ever held under Hitler or Stalin is now being staged in Iran by Premier Mossadegh in an effort to make himself unchallenged dictator of the country."

https://www.nytimes.com/1953/0...

And this is just the first entry on your list. The last entry references none other than Milosevic himself a highly decorated war criminal charged with crimes against humanity and genocide. There are numerous legitimate cases of US aggression (many times at the behest of corporate interests) even in the post WWII era..there is no need to pad lists with nonsense.

"Mortality data were obtained from the National Vital Statistics System, a population based registry of all deaths in the US from 1 January 2020-31 December 2022."

"To earn a license, London cabbies must memorize more than 25,000 streets within a 6-mile radius of Charing Cross, a challenge known as "The Knowledge" that takes three to four years. "

I think it is interesting authors of TFA would choose to inject tidbits well outside the bounds of the dataset to conclude two studies make a "coherent case" when the studies are looking at different things and this particular study conditions such linkages on begging the question.

"If a hypothetical link between hippocampal changes in taxi drivers and future risk of death from Alzheimerâ(TM)s disease exists, our findings among US taxi and bus drivers are consistent with studies of hippocampal changes (or lack thereof) among their London counterparts."

Also I have to take issue with collecting only two years of data when more is readily available and leaving out 100 occupation codes without any explanation whatsoever. The story starts with what they preselected... no inclusion or exclusion criteria... nothing. This study has no credibility as far as I'm concerned.

I've done nothing except ask questions. This was your statement not mine: "The current generation of LLM assistants are equivalent in quality of output to having a junior human associate, but at 1/100th the cost"

I'm simply asking obvious follow up questions. What would those attributes be? Is "quality of output" the work product or were you referring to something else? If it was the work product which I presume you were referring to what of substance do you believe remains? If you meant something else by "quality of output" what?

Act like a sesquipedalian while standing on ones head.