This year's renewal of home insurance cam with all kinds of new stipulations.
One was satellite photos from Google Earth with areas of my roof circled where they suspected some damage. I was able to have a conversation with my agent and the underwriter and tell them when we last replaced the roof, and assured them that we had been on the roof recently (Christmas lights) and got them to back off. It sounded like they were using some machine analysis looking for odd stain patterns.
My take is that the industry as a whole is trying to improve the quality of their assessments and risk exposure.
And then you get in a VFR over IMC situation... kaboom!
Then we see everyone LOL until the falling bits land in their BBQ, then it will be WTF and everyone goes all NIMBY.
Ha! You beat me to it. I was going to do this and try to work 'EIEIO' into it.
Please address the shopkeeper who finds has a drug-addled person sleeping in their doorway. The shopkeeper whose customers are scared to come downtown anymore. When you say "It is their [i.e. drug user's] choice", well yeah, but choices have consequences. What about the consequences on everyone else? Does everyone in society have to back off in order to accommodate some random person's bad / dangerous / scary / threatening / disturbed behaviors? It appears you are saying yes. It's a hard no for me.
Everyone seems to be talking about their rights, but rights come with responsibilities.
There's that old saying which comes to mind... "your right to swing your arms ends where somebody else's face begins."
Bus error -- please leave by the rear door.