Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Why ? (Score 1) 108

It didn't tell me what to select. It did a side-by-side comparison of the various attributes of each plan, comparing things like deductibles, coinsurance, max out of pocket, etc. While I don't doubt that Gemini and its kin will offer product placement, it's a whole other thing to distort such a comparison.

Comment Measurable levels vs. toxic levels (Score 3, Insightful) 51

According to CDC data, more than 90% of Americans have measurable levels of these chemicals in their bodies

Toxicity is always a function of concentration. Always. Even water is toxic if ingested at high enough levels.

What is the spread between "measurable" and "toxic" for these plastics?

And what health *benefits* do we sacrifice if we give up plastics?

Sealed plastic containers are highly effective at controlling bacterial growth, for example. Flossing your teeth with plastic (nylon) is universally recommended by dentists for dental health. Plastic tubing is universally used in IVs. Many of these health-*positive* uses would be very difficult to reproduce with other materials.

Comment Changing punctuation habits *do* make it easier (Score 1) 43

The author argues that shorter sentences are just the result of using periods where semicolons or colons used to be used.

Oliver argues that much of what modern datasets measure as declining sentence length is actually just changing punctuation habits. Writers now use periods where earlier generations used colons and semicolons.

But I'd argue that these long sentences, made up of clauses joined by colons or semicolons--*are* harder to read. Using periods instead, forces the author to write sentences that are shorter and more self-contained.

It's like the old quote that "If I had more time, I would have written a shorter letter." Writing thoughts concisely does take more effort, but it results in text that is easier to digest.

Comment Re:Why ? (Score 1) 108

I used Gemini in Chrome just yesterday.

My son was signing up for his company's health insurance plan. He had three choices, and the options weren't easy to decipher, and the text was long. AI was able to show me a nice three-column comparison of what was different in the three plans, just by reading the text on the page. I spot-checked its findings, they were right on.

Despite the backlash from many, there are many ways in which AI helps people in very tangible ways.

Comment Make buyers hold securities or stocks (Score 1) 102

This problem goes away if the law changes to require that purchasers of securities or stocks *hold* them for at least, say, one day. Or better yet, six months. Do that, and suddenly investors will start thinking about long-term returns, instead of microsecond returns. And that might lead them to think about the long-term health of companies. What a concept!

Comment Re:So if your job requires precision and quality (Score 3, Interesting) 26

I think we are imagining different definitions of "requires."

My company, for example, uses an AI scanning tool to look for code vulnerabilities. It turns out, the tool produces *so* many false positives, that it requires human developers *more* time to research and refute the false positives, than it took to find and fix vulnerabilities the old way. AI automation didn't reduce human effort, it increased it.

Slashdot Top Deals

It's not an optical illusion, it just looks like one. -- Phil White

Working...