The party leader incited the first putsch in the history of the republic and instead of abolishing him, the party rallied around him and expunged the members who tried to hold him accountable. A desire to overthrow elections is the definition I'm using.

Tell me, does that juvenile begging the question stuff ever work for you in real life?

> The people who pull their strings know exactly how to get them angry at the wrong people.

Exactly.

The best propaganda capitalizes on truthful grievance and
directs low information people to the wrong conclusions.

Because they would rather prop up fascism than spend that money on their own progressive candidates.

Its not like any of those fascists needed the help, they all easily won their primary races because maga voters voted for them.

It was just cynical playing with fire that harmed the party's credibility. You can't tell people the country is on the brink of fascism and then spend money helping fascists if you want anyone to believe you. They were damn lucky that the ~5 fascists they ran some ads for didn't actually win in the general.

His business partner, FTX CEO Ryan Salame spent money on maga.

Salame spent about $24M, and the largest single spend that either of them made was about $2.5M to mitch mcconnel's PAC, the senate leadership fund.

It should not surprise anyone that Reason, a koch bros front, neglected to mention any of that. Nor that the so-called liberal media left Salame out of almost all their reporting too.

https://popular.info/p/seven-p...

He shouldn't be "negotiating with his agent", of course Disney will just tell him to eff off. He should negotiate with his lawyers.

Advertisers are some of the biggest lying sleazebags in the world. And I say this married to a market researcher whose sister worked in advertising... Since when did we let the sleazeballs be in charge and call the shots? (Looks at politicians) Oh wait... don't answer...

Not just images, some words are blacklisted too...

This overly broad excuse comes up all the time. They are not legally obligated to kill the goose that lays the golden eggs. Youtube does not produce content. Content creators take time and effort to make content. If they don't get paid, said content disappears and Youtube becomes useless. How's that shareholder profit now?

TV channels cost money to run. So they should run ads and then not pay for the shows which they broadcast... well done, just another reason for people to leave Youtube for other services.

You just can't exploit robots as much...

Perhaps he was referring to masturbation? I mean, it worked for David Carradine...

It's obviously fake because that kind of shit would 100% be handled by an actor's agency and not the actor themselves. They have to earn their cut somehow.

See? An octal format would prevent that...

Wait - you mean BOTH parties have to be in agreement for a contract to be valid? Every time I click "I agree" on an EULA a company representative never comes to my house to pick up my modifications to the terms of service - despite it clearly saying that they need to do this in the copy I provide for them. I also reserve the right to modify these terms from time to time. The fact that they allow me to agree despite my modifications implies that they consent to the amended terms of service. Because a contract is between TWO parties.

Whose password in any case was "hunter02" apparently...