Comment Topics? (Score 5, Funny) 135
Submission + - 'Let's Encrypt' project to issue first free digital certificates next month (thestack.com)
Submission + - Pirate Party founder Rick Falkvinge launches news service (falkvinge.net)
Comment Re:If Only (Score 1) 25
Well, it actually doesn't, at least not reliably. With the ability to retroactively alter history, you can never be 100% sure that someone didn't sneak a change into the repository without reviewing every line of every diff. Have fun!
Yes it does. It's called signed tags.
Comment A small step in the right direction (Score 1) 138
I consider this to be really good news, although the Facebook mails might not be the number one prio for applying encryption... besides when used for password recovery.
First it raises awareness about PGP which might cause more people to use PGP to encrypt and sign their emails.
Secondly I hope that more communities (LinkedIn, Twitter etc) follow this and thus raises even more awareness.
When will
Submission + - Facebook Now Supports PGP To Send You Encrypted Emails
Comment Chromecast? (Score 5, Interesting) 121
No news about supporting Google Chromecast? The discussion on the forum[1] has been dead quite some time. I can see in the git repo that there actually *is* code present (cast.cpp) and I would guess that this would be a really appreciated feature.
Submission + - Swedish Police Raid The Pirate Bay Again. (torrentfreak.com)
Comment Re:No thanks... (Score 1) 212
This is a protocol for signing a certificate and anyone can view their proposal: https://github.com/letsencrypt...
Comment Re:quick question (Score 2) 212
The "certificate authority that issues free certificates to any website" can actually be one or many of the CAs that is popular today. This is just a new protocol for the way to get a certificate signed by one of these CAs. So if some CA issues as a cert to the NSA for your domain right now there is nothing here that prevents that CA for doing it when using this new protocol.
Comment Re:The right time is 13:37 (Score 1) 109
9:42 may be good enough for the masses but for the elite only 13:37 will do. [...]
13:37 would be a horrible timestamp to use in US ads. Some people would actually discard the product since it is a 24 hour clock instead of 12 hour AM/PM.
Comment MS OWA (Score 1) 496
Comment Re:I got an idea (Score 1) 326
#!/bin/sh
WORDS="bomd nuclear+bomb jihad destroy+the+Swedish+government bomb+assembly+guide kill+Fredrik+Reinfeldt"
for i in $WORDS; do
wget -U 'fittfra' http://www.google.com/search?q=$i
done