So who is to blame when someone uses a model that has had the safety rails deliberately stripped off, like a Heretic or Abliterix fine tune? These are generally couched in "for research purposes only" terms, but I use an Abliterix fine tune of Gemma 4 26B-A4B as my "daily driver". It absolutely never refuses anything, although it spends a lot of time patting itself on the back for understanding what I say well enough to paraphrase it (reasonably) accurately.

Having $40 million in gold would be on-brand for a Russian oligarch. I have no idea why he would need to do this inside the U.S. though.

When you're on the ride of a sigmoid curve, you never know where you are. How many times has Moore's Law died now?

Why is this a problem? It's just another job opportunity for Marco Rubio. Even AI is afraid of being replaced by Rubio.

How do you know that's not just one significant digit, which would mean >95%? Or maybe it only has one-bit resolution and it's anything over 50%.

It makes all the difference whether someone is being an asshole to you, or an asshole for you. Sometimes you actually welcome the latter case.

The powers that be will say "let them fight".

In my experience, no... but context loops are a hint the model is starting to go mad and should probably do some of this "dreaming" to consolidate memories and correct some of the semantic drift it has incurred.

Enlarging the size of the House of Representatives would also eliminate the tyranny of the Electoral College. Two senators per empty state won't matter when even those empty states have six or eight representatives and the largest have hundreds.

Where do you think he learned about penis birds?

This is why the Bag of Holding remains such a popular magic item. That would reduce 500 pounds down to 15, and the remaining 170 could easily be distributed across the party.

LLMs don't actually know their own capabilities.The description of what they *should* do is baked into the training data, but this doesn't always correlate with their actual abilities. Sometimes they can do things and not even know, and they can't tell if tools they should have are being disabled in some way. For example, Qwen 3.5 is a vision-capable model, but enabling vision in llama.cpp requires loading an additional file with the --mmproj parameter. The model will think it has vision enabled whether the extra file is loaded or not.

Go become an hero.

That's all this is, nVidia realizes that if the bubble were to pop tomorrow, they could survive... but they might not if they keep extending credit to companies that might not be able to ever generate a return on that investment.

It's just like the guy selling pickaxes and shovels saying "you've had long enough to find gold, no more credit for you."