Comment Re:sarcasm aside (Score 1) 42
Yes, but now you have it too complicated for 95% of the vibe coders. So they simply won't do it. Because skipping all of those steps still results in something that compiles.
Yes, but now you have it too complicated for 95% of the vibe coders. So they simply won't do it. Because skipping all of those steps still results in something that compiles.
They *should* be going back to managing their work flow with spreadsheets, like they used to.
They fuck up spreadsheets as well. A truckload of business-critical spreadsheets have errors in them that often go undetected for years.
It's hard enough to get actual developers to properly consider security. Not surprised at all that vibe coders don't.
Plus, of course, most of the training data is insecure to begin with.
But let them learn by fire that there's a reason actual programmers take time to ship a product, and it's not that the AI can type faster.
I looked it up. Asus's fiscal year is January through December (same as the calendar year).
Problem is: We don't even know what consciousness is.
So the best we can say is if something creates the impression of having one, based on whom we attribute consciousness to, i.e. other humans. Well, big surprise that a model explicitly trained on human language and texts creates that impression. It does show just how good the models are. At pretending to be human because they have a shitload of examples on what humans would say.
For all we know, the gas clouds on Jupiter could be conscious, just in a way that is completely baffling to us. We can't rule it out because we don't know what consciousness is, so we can't test for it.
If an attacker has enough control of your machine to dump the password database, they have enough control to get it to retrieve the plaintext passwords
Not true.
An attacker may have a limited window. He might exploit some other vulnerability to do some operation with privileged access rights, but not have an admin shell.
Microsoft [...] stores passwords in plaintext in RAM
You're not saying?
But they take security so seriously. They said. They promised. This time for real. No, this time. Ok, next time.
I remember when virtualization was the new hot thing roughly 20 years back and VM ware was aquired by some big corp, instantly turned to shit and the FOSS crowd started pushing out VM solutions to counter the problem.
They got bought by EMC, which at the time was a Dell company. Then they got acquired by Dell directly. Then they got spun off as their own company, which lasted a year or two before Broadcom snapped them up. Through the whole ordeal, they were sustained mainly by a combination of legit vendor lock-in and people just drinking the Kool-Aid.
COO: "I'm fed up with Broadcom's ridiculous price hikes! We need to get off VMware like yesterday!"
CTO: "But where will I get my headaches, proprietary tools, and vendor lock-in? Hmmmmmm...."
Actually, mainframes give you a level of reliability and other things you basically get nowhere else. But the cost is high. Even big banks only use them for critical things.
Sure, but we're talking about organizations that have already successfully deployed on VMware. If they didn't need all this massive transactional integrity and twelve-nines uptime back then, they don't now.
But knowing the industry-standard tools might make the education pay off a little better.
It's not trivial to get credit cards in the UK. Say you were bankrupted even a long time ago. Or, I heard, say you never borrowed money or you never once paid late fees, surcharges, etc.
On the other hand, suppose you just stole somebody's wallet. Bet you could get that $1 charge through before they canceled it, and they wouldn't notice.
This.
Whenever a politician claims that something is "to protect the children", you can be 100%, absolutely certain that it is not about the children.
Tell you what, you "prove" that the religion of your choice is a "real" religion
Oh, that's trivial: a) it's made-up nonsense, b) it tells people how to live their lives and c) it's been around for so long that people forgot that it's made-up nonsense.
None of that or the rest of your answer has anything to do with the point I was making: That "accepted as a religion in the USA" isn't much of an argument. If people can get Jedi accepted as a religion, it just proves how meaningless all of that is. Other countries have correctly identified Scientology as a pyramid scheme and a scam.
The fact that other religions would qualify for that as well doesn't make it any less true.
Google is your friend. In the US the IRS recognizes it as a religion,
Yeah, but isn't the bar for that ridiculously low in the US? Like the Jedi "religion" being tax-exempt on religious grounds? And there's no discussion that that one is based purely on fiction.
"Kill the Wabbit, Kill the Wabbit, Kill the Wabbit!" -- Looney Tunes, "What's Opera Doc?" (1957, Chuck Jones)