"Bill Clinton at least got the family leave act passed."
He also signed the TCA which brought us the dominance of Fox and Sinclair. And also the welfare reform act that brought us the work requirement for SNAP. Fuck that fucking fuck.
Other companies do sell hardware with everything soldered, but they also sell hardware which is not like that, like apple USED to do. Claiming they are the same is nonsense.
We request crap. It's made in Asia and when it breaks we send it back to Asia. They take it because we pay them to take it.
It's people paying to move crap around all the way down.
Yes, at this point I have a lot of investments
if you have investments, which can then employ people, you're not hoarding money. Your money has been employed so that it can circulate and do work.
What if building new safer nuclear allows us to decommission the older, more dangerous nuclear that is 'in the mix' earlier?
Great. Do that, on the same site only.
If the Republicans don't want to be known as the "I love Hitler" party, they might need to take a stronger stance on large numbers of their members talking like that.
They don't plan to let us vote again*, so they don't care who they alienate.
* They could of course do scam elections like they do in Russia, to pacify dumbshits
It leads to lawsuits not to break monopoly, but to extract money. In some countries money is evil over a certain amount.
It doesn't matter where you are, hoarding while others do not have enough is evil, and hoarding cash (the wealthy currently have unprecedented cash reserves) exacerbates that. We need currency to circulate in order for the economy to function, so we print more money, and therefore the currency hoarders literally cause inflation. We keep hearing about the "job creators" but currency hoarders are job preventers.
With that said, none of that is relevant to whether the EU has the right to use lawsuits to break antitrust which is not monopoly-related. Insisting that only monopolies are relevant to laws which prevent anticompetitive actions in marketplaces is ignorant at best and therefore your focus on monopolies is likewise. But I don't believe you're that ignorant, which makes it seem more like malice.
Problem is though, if you look at all the major economies, the ones with the lowest CO2 per capita have nuclear in the mix.
Having nuclear in the mix is one thing, and "therefore we need to build more nuclear power" is something else. When we started building nuclear plants they arguably made sense, now building more definitely doesn't as we have cleaner alternatives.
Yeah, but not the old Delhi.
Ok bot.
No monopoly is required for them to violate the law.
That's true even in the US, not that we enforce antitrust law here.
And you've made your own non-anonymous coward comment. You're afraid to not be a cuck for corporations.
The Luddites didn't want to ban technology.
They wanted The People to share in the benefits, not just the capitalists (who have all the investment capital.)
You are still falling for and propagating anti-Luddite PR over a century old.
After that, there may be mass disease spreading in livestock which could severely affect our food supply.
You will eat nothing and like it.
Or, you know, starve.
Now do the calculations with a non-swasticar.
Tesla is worst at service of all US automakers, who wants to be chained to them?
The disks are getting full; purge a file today.
