That is a really interesting idea.
That is a really interesting idea.
Yes it is but people have been trying to do that for 40 years and have not gotten it right yet so...
Wrong. Plenty of code correctness has been deployed in service of this goal.
Unfortunately, there are endemic economic and political reasons why we constantly choose the protocols and implementations that are bigger, hairier, and less continent.
All you need is a culture of kicking non-conforming implementations to the curb, and then the rigorous implementations have a chance to emerge from the weeds. Do we have such a culture? No—most of the time—no, we do not. Such a culture would cramp Megacorp style, and interfere with timeless value-adds, such as embrace and extend, closed ecosystem, DRM jungle, NIST-sanctioned algorithmic weevils, definition by implementation, documentation by implementation, etc. etc.
Far, far away in dull and dusty places like the Erlang OTP or Bernstein's qmail or Knuth's TeX—or perhaps even the Google protocol buffers for at least one lucky and unusually blessed language binding from the somewhat recent past—you just might find a rigorously coded parser or two.
For the most part, however, I agree. We'll probably never have rigorous parsers in a dominant culture of "screw everyone else", Wild West dysenteroperability.
Of course NASA passed on decades of hard-won experience. They're not psychopaths.
It went something like this:
Hire only the best and the brightest, keep the group challenged and engaged for decade upon decade, with frequent launch opportunities pushing the boundary of the possible at each and every iteration.
N.B.: Sorry, there's no silver bullet.
My favourite touch is the two giant call-outs in the linked article.
Few of the sites I read regularly have these any more (meaning since I got good at "inspect element" and custom User CSS overrides; appears I've accumulated 150 of these over the past three years, also used to defeat anything that hovers or slides annoyingly).
Basketball is inherently racist, as genetic traits are heritable and are correlated with your ethnic/genetic background.
What's racist about race is presupposing outcomes that were highly predictable on first impression, because it's lamentably a very short step for an advantaged social group—often one of relatively homogeneous racial composition, suffused with elaborate rituals of social etiquette—to conclude that a disadvantaged racial subgroup never given an opportunity to do x can't do x.
Race isn't just some magic third rail used to divide humans into two distinct groups, in much the same way that humans divide house pets into two distinct groups: potty trained and not potty trained. There are days, though, where that can be a good working assumption.
If the basic income is too low, the "pensioners" are incentivized to vote instead of accepting it.
With due respect, you have no idea what Fascism is. Fascism is basic dictatorship with a nationalist ideology. It features a specific individual, the dictator, who can't be voted out of power and sublimates individuals to the "nation's" need as defined by that dictator.
What I suggested is a cross between democracy and feudalism. A core self-selecting nobility rule by democratic vote. Anyone can join the nobility. A homeless woman on the streets can join the nobility. But there's a monetary incentive not to, to select serfdom and be ruled instead. The "nobility" is incentivized to maintain a high enough basic income for the "serfs" that they continue to choose serfdom.
The key, of course, is choice. Every single individual has a choice.
Somehow this story showed up in my Slashdot feed, when it's really just supposed to trigger a mass outpouring of the reflex derision arc among those so inclined (said barf cookies falsely paraded by its practitioners as chuckle fodder).
"There, don't you feel better now? Now come sit with us at the adult table." Amazing what a quickie bile purge can accomplish in raising the level of discussion elsewhere.
This is all good. Yet somehow my dank, reeking bile seems to have been misclassified as grasshopper lipstick and I seem to be trapped in completely the wrong purgative honeypot. Where do I unclick "chuckle fodder"? Where do I unclick "news-item-of-the-week free-association paralympics"? Which direction do I kneel to moon Marvin, patron saint of universal laugh-at-anything good will?
No, I'm not new here. It must be shocking to some that I haven't figured out my account configuration yet. You'd think I'd know by now that no unexplored configuration sub-menu goes ultimately unpunished.
Well, now I know. True hell is becoming stuck in the wrong hellban honeypot.
Personally, I'd be in favor of an optional basic income. The plan is this: You can register to vote or you can register for the basic income. But not both.
The side effect of your Mercedes choosing to impact the young mother with her baby stroller instead of the nearby telephone pole (ouch! that could hurt!) is that the customer's testicles fall off, and his dick never rises for the rest of his miserable, injury-free life (female customers sensibly snipped the wires on this pathetic contraction long ago).
The Mercedes survivor can always tell his disappointed women, "not MY fault, the Mercedes made me do it". Mercedes! Modestly dressed women cross themselves. Everyone spits.
All this spit makes the sidewalks dangerous to navigate for the common folk, but we can all rest safe knowing that the privileged remain comfy and cozy inside their steel cocoons.
12 year old girl and accusing her of "wanting" an older man to rape her into a coma seems sketchy to me
Hillary: Your honour, I submit that the innocent-looking 12-year-old girl you see before you was slavering and panting to have my defendant, an older man, to rape her into a coma.
Yes, that's exactly how it plays out on Matlock.
Opposing council: [passing in the hallway, afterwards]: Good lord, Hillary, how did you become so damn good at this lawyering business? Your argument for the defense was a fucking masterstroke! Clearly you're headed for bigger and better things.
This might actually be more about the crawl than the index. The mobile index could be set to crawl content in mobile format only, and more often.
What makes freshness important, in the first place? Mostly celebrity gossip, and the retail deal of the hour. Neither of those are functions people do much on PCs anyway.
Still, if Google decides not to keep long-form content reasonably fresh (if not fresher) in their desktop index, it foreshadows a Yahooesque self-inflicted extinction event of their traditional core brand.
Now Yahoo just needs to explain what system or software or mental competence they're in the middle of upgrading that causes them not to tell people what's about to happen before it happens.
Sure hope Competence 11.0 is finally the one that ignites self-perception.
As long as you believe all that matters is engineering, people will fail to utilize the technology that engineering can bring.
Nicely done. You just lumped Steve Jobs in with Arnold "the Knife" Morris.
The last of the Morrises to be active in the pitching business is Arnold "the Knife" Morris, so named because of his extraordinary skill with the Sharpcut, the forerunner of the Ginsu. He is in his early seventies, a cheerful, impish man with a round face and a few wisps of white hair, and a trademark move whereby, after cutting a tomato into neat, regular slices, he deftly lines the pieces up in an even row against the flat edge of the blade.
Sure, sharpened steel is a great technology, but will people actually use it unless first impressed by a delightfully manicured tomato?
The turn requires the management of expectation. That's why Arnold always kept a pineapple tantalizingly perched on his stand. "For forty years, I've been promising to show people how to cut the pineapple, and I've never cut it once," he says.
Steve's legendary pineapple was his insistence that RISC would blow CISC out of the water. That pineapple never danced (excluding, for a while, one or two hand-picked Photoshop effects). Miraculously, it still hasn't danced.
How could this be? Let's dissect.
In 1982, after racking up nine felonies, he was sent to Graterford Prison for 18 years.
That sure sounds like the 8088 I knew and loved.
Over the next two years he scored 21 victories in 21 fights, 16 by KO and 12 of those in the first round.
"Younger guys would think that an old boxer must be an easy target," Sugar said, "Only to find out when they stood in front of him they couldn't hit him with a handful of stones."
To it's credit, The DEC Alpha actually landed a punch. Others, not so much.
At 41, Hopkins finally seemed washed up. But he adapted, deciding to put on a few pounds and move up in weight class. "It was a new life for me," he said. "I could finally eat pasta and not worry about going over the weight limit."
It was AMD that finally provided the magic milkshake.
At 46 years, four months and 10 days he broke George Foreman's record to become the oldest fighter ever to win a world championship.
Ye olde 8088 has sure come a long way.
Where x86 went up in weight class, Jobs ultimately—not with the once-franchise iMac, but the iPhone—successfully went down in weight class. That much-vaunted 10" chef knife went nowhere fast after decades of trying, but he stuck with it—full marks—and finally made a freaking fortune on pastel-coloured paring knives.
Meanwhile, Ritchie improved steel. Advantage: Ritchie.
Optimization hinders evolution.