"...considering that the goal is not required by the statute and does not serve any positive purpose..."

Does not serve any positive purpose? Positive purpose must mean making him money personally.

Except we aren't talking about a mere definition of broadband, nor do we care what your data rate requirements are.

None of that is true. Grow up and learn how to understand and rate journalism. Start with Appling the spj code of ethics to media.
" Anyone who defends that is off the deep end self-deluding and in full on denial of reality. "
So you post a factual incorrect statement then call anyone with facts delusional. JFC, take some actual media course. Like, in a class room.

He's incapably of learning. I don't thing he has learned anything since 1980.

OFFS lease stop lying. You wither didn't read it, or didn't understand it.
Some of us remember when he was alive, and read went o to study him.
If you actually know what you were talking about, you would understand the difference between Marxist communism and socialism.

Liars like you have become tiresome.

No, you did not. Yor just making things up becasue you are likely functionally illiterate, can'[t hold complex thought or idea, and have no clue how to admit you are wrong. I pity you, Because your are embarrassingly wrong.

That's actually not true at all. Please tell me how many American FDR called evil? Literally one of the, if not the most socialist president whose social programs led to American become a technological and industrial power house.

American modern conservatives primary planks are to take rights away from marginalized group; which s fucking evil.

Get over yourself and read some books.

'Lot of money'. Not really. Historical what they do give is pretty divided, depending on the actual issues.

Your kink actual shows it is. The lawsuit is BS, like most Trumps lawsuits. He is trying extort them is get their companies to kiss his ass and not say anything against them. The is SOP for Trump, going back to the 90s.
This is actual censorship by the governemnt.

"I think it is fundamentally a crisis of trust," Amodei said. "I think that ordinary people don't trust companies, governments, or the tech industry and always suspect that we are cooking up some new way to screw them over."

What insight. Could it be because that's exactly what happens? Capitalism is literally defined by this. And no, public distrust isn't because of "AI leaders" making warnings, it's because of the threat AI poses to people's lives. All of this bullshit pretends that there aren't real facts on the ground, AI is proving what it is, the public has taken notice.

Perhaps learn to get along rather than be racist?

Supply them with what?

"We don't know if AI data centers in space will be important in the future."

No, we do.

I believe the question assumed reality, your answers do not. Why doesn't China just build a fleet of starships instead?

"Anything that isn't already open source can have an AI replacement coded in hours now. "

False. The vast majority of software is embedded, that software cannot be replaced in hours. It would take longer to just communicate the platform information needed to begin.

All software that is shit can replaced in hours. Seems like the only software /. posters know.

It's not money, it never existed so it didn't have to disappear.