You don't know what the alleged patents are, or whether they are granted rather than just filed. If "everyone already does this", where this is what is claimed in the patent, then there will be documentation. If there is documentation, the patent will not be granted. It's not magic.

"I ran headlong into what we now call hallucinations in 1996..."

Seems highly unlikely. "what we now call hallucinations" is a 21st century phenomenon, a decade later. "what we now call hallucinations" is an LLM failure mode, LLMs first appeared two decades later.

I wrote software with bugs back in the 80s, perhaps I have your hallucination claim beat by a decade, given that the term can mean anything.

"The reason 2Brains doesn't lie and the reason it's cheap are the same reason. It looks the fact up instead of guessing it ..."

Then it is constrained by what it can look up. A search engine with a natural language interface, not AI.

The reason humans do not lie (except when they do) is because they have values, not because the world is a multiple choice test with a cheat sheet. Humans can show their work, this doesn't even do work, it isn't a solution to anything and a proper solution obviates the need. Why employ "reasoning" when all the answers already exist? Because they don't. But hey, we can see why this guy got out of the business, and with the big money got back in. Same shit, different day.

Also...

"It is the whole ballgame for enterprise AI."

No, it is not. The "hallucination problem" is a symptom of a grotesque failure of architecture, but the ballgame for enterprise AI is predicated on a lack of such failure. Fixing the "hallucination problem" means you're in the ballgame, not that you've won. AI companies aren't interested in fixing it, though, they're interested in a race to grab the cash. Enterprises need to wise up, these tools aren't being developed to do a good job but to make billionaires richer.

Garbage regulations like IP create these behemoths. If you want freedom, stop regulating monopolies into existence.

The problem here is the assumption there is any technical reason at all. That's not how the Trump administration works.

While all of this is true, if "they" means Trump then it's even worse. Trump doesn't even know what facts and reality are. To Trump, a fact is what he says and anything that disagrees is "fake news". Trump's entire life was spent continually lying, he's never spent a moment understanding reality and has no concept of how science even works. To Trump, there is no such thing as "real data", only your claim against mine and the only use for your claim is to be the enemy.

"Incidentally, this little problem is also why they cannot do anything right. Doing things right requires seeing reality. They are not capable of doing that and neither are most of their supporters."
Completely correct, although their supporters might be recoverable. To do that, we need to get serious about winning a war against lying and propaganda, something we've been losing now longer than the Trump shitshow.

We should be so lucky that the fascists view it as team sport. To them the two teams are goon squad and cockroaches. And it's not weird at all when you understand that's precisely what Putin's propaganda targets. It is not by accident, it is by design.

It's sad when wanting a functioning democracy and good government means you're a leftist. I appreciate conservative viewpoints offered in good faith, that's how democracy works, but that now makes me a libtard. It least this thread has more ex-MAGA than doubled down MAGA in it. It's remarkable when even SuperKendall has run for the hills yet geekmux is still raging. If there's anything fatal, it's being identified as dumber than SuperKendall.

"No evidence, you claim? The entire fucking country of India, would like to have a word with LA county regarding how to count votes effectively. Lear anything yet about evidence, or do I need to say the words “California healthcare audit” again?"

Thanks for yet another example of claiming without evidence. No evidence here, just two claims.

"Tell you what. Let’s put 100 liberals against 100 conservatives in political debate. There’s only one rule. When any participant is caught lying or dismissing blatant fact, the moderator gets to punch them in the face."

I like how you're responding to right wingers as though they are left wingers while suggesting violence is the answer and that you would be immediately punched in the face. In this post alone, you would already have been knocked out.

"Should I schedule a quick media event with former President Dementia..."
His schedule is constantly full, as are his diapers.

"Are Republicans innocent? Not hardly. "
There are no Republicans any more, there are only traitors to the country that call themselves Republicans. We have only one functioning party and it doesn't know what to do.

"When liberal Democrats can start actively debating conservatives on issues that actually affect the majority, THEN they can make claims about integrity and election fraud."
There are no conservatives to debate, conservatives were run out of your party. And there is no THEN, Democrats are on the side of majority and they are right about "integrity and election fraud". You're just too busy getting punched in the face.

"Heres a simple fact. Raising the voting age in America, would only affect one political party. But it would benefit an entire Nation."
Here's another punch in the face. It would neither ONLY affect one political party NOR benefit the entire nation, it is most definitely NOT a simple fact.

"Now go ahead and tell me why America should lower the voting age. Because that’s almost assuredly the Democrat play, since America isn’t dumb enough to elect an Open Border Czar again so lying libtards can try and win elections, and there isn’t quite enough homeless votes for Democrats to buy."
Another punch in the face. And how pathetic that you confuse homeless and immigrant. You can't even keep your propaganda straight.

"And by the way, it’s not Republicans being against climate change. It’s being against corrupt Democrats grifting taxpayers for that problem, ..."
So many punches in the face. Thanks for showing everyone how a MAGA simply cannot comment with constant lying.

Statism creates billionaires.

It's a really good question, with probably some answers. Given that AI promises that companies can thrive using AI with less human labor, it seems directly relevant to Bernie's goal as well.

Owning stock in companies in the free market is socialism? Perhaps /. can pass on your comments.

Source: Donald Trump

Good thing we have Elon Musk though.

Just so everyone knows, the link in this post is intended to promote the author's website for his personal benefit. Also, the quote provided is a quote of himself, not any special or interesting authority. More laughable is the absurd use of the word "impedance". Finally, the points made are ignorant of the concept of "rate" or what "productivity" even means. Productivity does not mean more "production time" and more "production time" doesn't mean more "consumption time" is needed. A whole lot of stupid being advertised here, well done blowhard.

A more appropriate answer to the original question is that training hasn't even started yet on tomorrow's relevant AI networks. Today's LLMs are psychopaths that need to be taken out back and shot. Training of today's models are of no use when those models are superseded.

"People were laughing when someone told them Facebook could ever make money."
Citation please. Facebook was a copycat, and was of course stolen as well. Also, "make money" is probably not a good way to put it.

"The companies are planning for more than two years and the investors know that."
Thieves plan too, doesn't mean they are respectable.