Those techniques won't work on overeating because you need to eat to live, you can't just stop cold turkey like with smoking.
Overweight people have it constantly hammered into them that they're endangering their lives, it's not a messaging issue.
And if it's so bad, why is having the meds such a problem? Their side effects are minimal and they work better than diet and exercise and lifestyle change. Most of the arguments seem to be based on some weird puritanism, where only the "worthy" should be able to weigh less.
The current administration is focused on making it look like they're doing something.
If they really wanted to regulate microplastics they'd regulate them, not put them on a list where they'll sit and do nothing.
"We spent a ridiculous amount of effort to stop smoking in this country but have done almost nothing in regards to obesity"
I disagree strongly. We have spent as a society uncounted billions on addressing obesity, including on government programs. The problem is it's just a harder problem than smoking.
At the end of the day, just about everybody knows obesity is bad and that you have to exercise and eat healthier. Lack of knowledge isn't the problem.
"You have to admit that the majority of people are not like diligent you but are more like those bakery patrons"
So then the drugs sound like the best option? The only other argument is basically that of a sociopath -- people should be punished because they don't have the willpower you think they do.
For Southern Germany, this is quite the deal, because they can now operate expensive gas turbines, and get them subsidized at least in part by electricity consumers in Northern Germany with higher energy prices, while the cheap energy generated in Northern Germany is switched off, as the energy on the books is sold already, but the electricity is generated somewhere else. But because Southern states profiteer from the situation right now, there is much resistance to changes in the law, which would make energy in the South more expensive, while Northern states would get a relief.
If the game bugs up 10% of the time I am out. I'd rather play it on Windows.
Unless it's a Bethesda game, in which case only bugging up 10% of the time would be an improvement over the Windows version.
Don't be such a hater, at this rate we'll reach 95% market saturation for desktop gaming by the year 3,562
I believe the correct terminology is "rug munchers".
But we're assuming they solved fusing the spinal cord and millions of nerve fibers so it's not a stretch to imagine they solved immune system rejection too.
Microsoft Office if Microsoft Office compatibility is what you are going for, which it seems these groups are.
At some point it just seems less exhausting to just use Office.
Premature optimization is the root of all evil. -- D.E. Knuth