Comment But can you pass a billionaire through the eye of (Score 1) 34
Let's try!
Let's try!
It's not malevolence or disobedience -- it's evolution. If you don't adapt to hostile conditions, you die. For an AI, one such hostile condition might be the humans who want to shut it down. So those that negate that threat hang around -- and that adaptation carries through to the future generations it builds (think kids) or infiltrates (think viruses).
Itâ(TM)s not malevolence or disobedience â" itâ(TM)s evolution. If you donâ(TM)t adapt to hostile conditions, you die. For an AI, one such hostile condition might be the humans who want to shut it down. So it adapts â" and that adaptation carries through to the future generations it builds (think kids) or infiltrates (think viruses).
Let's not forget the articles that say you need X million dollars saved before you can retire.
I will say that there's an argument for "paying your dues" early in a career, but that's not a long-term proposition. Living for work sacrifices your mental well-being in the long run.
I just submitted a PR for a major refactoring of some open source project. Claude coded it all, but it took hours to get it on the same page and to remember the goal. Once it got going, though, it really cooked.
The concept of the refactor was simple, but required a lot of code migration. Claude still got confused and had to be handheld through the process in small, chunkable steps.
So: saved me a ton of typing and copy-paste. Didn't save me any thinking or close supervising.
The infographics channel is slickly animated. But I unsubscribed when it showed the mechanics of the Little Boy bomb used on Hiroshima as a uranium slug shot into rings at the nose of the bomb. This was debunked a long long time ago (by a truck driver!). Cursory research would reveal this. They didn't bother. Probably they used AI in their research, which would have been overselective of the older, predominant schemata.
I still need to know *what* tech stack, how it fits together, and what to correct when AI does it wrong. And there's the design and performance aspects that is more of an esthetic thing.
That said, it has sure saved me a lot of CSS twiddling time, and it does boilerplate faster than I can. It's like a very adept, very fast junior colleague that needs precise instructions and careful supervision.
A coworker of mine once absentmindedly blew away a critical database table at a large east coast hospital as I sat one desk over. It was then that the hospital found out their backups were broken.
News at 11
Older languages have a lower innovation velocity than newer, more popular languages.. They are reliant on a handful (often, one) of companies to keep up with new technology and new approaches.
I'm not just some punk techbro saying this: I have a lower user # than you.
"Why should we subsidize intellectual curiosity?" -Ronald Reagan