Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:A 94% chance of getting hired (Score 1) 157

I'd like to see stats based on 100% of able-bodied, not-on-mat/pat leave, working-age, non-incarcerated people wanting to work, and then measuring the percentage of a standard work week per capita.

Total hours being worked divided by total available labour-hours.

Comment Re:WINNING (Score 1) 249

You think the Republicans, who now control everything including the Supreme Court, who can apparently run masked thugs around the country abducting people, denying them due process, and send them to concentration camps, will limit themselves to gerrymandering and a bit of light voter intimidation and maybe another seditious assault on the government if they lose?

The US is in for some highly corrupt elections, and anybody who complains about it is in for a world of hurt unless they're rich, white, and connected.

Comment Re:registered-only list. (Score 1) 51

Phone-to-provider encryption seems like a better option. The only unencrypted information to start with would be your provider's ID, so your traffic is routed to their systems for decryption. Basically... my best current guess for greater security? Give up your mobile phone number, use data and a VOIP app. Then the cops will have to get a warrant (assuming your VOIP provider worries about that) not only to know the content of your conversation, but even to know who you called.

You're never going to be able to hide your phone ID and location with current cellular technology, though. You're not connecting to a tower at all unless it knows you're a valid client, and once you connect to a tower they at least know your general direction (most towers have antennas facing each direction, and aren't omnidirectional) and can guess your range. If you hit three or more towers, they can start to approach GPS accuracy pinning you down.

Long before you have to worry about all that, the cops will already have you under surveillance. Every box on every pole around your usual hangouts could be a camera and mic. They could have put devices in your car or home. And I wouldn't bet on them waiting on a warrant to do these things. The warrant will come when they think they'll need to use the information in court and might get called on it.

Comment Re:LibreOffice improved (Score 1) 221

>That's way too costly. Even many mid sized businesses and lower end large businesses won't pay the vast sums that kind of support costs. Instead they'll hire someone to do IT for them.

Yes. Small IT support companies that in turn have relationships with the major product vendors and can, when required, use them to get higher level support.

Please - show me where in Toronto there is a company that can do that - even if they only employ people who can remove & reinstall & do basic configuration, but can call upon top level, very capable dev-level support. I'd love to be recommending a path off of MS Office to my employer.

Comment Re:LibreOffice improved (Score 1) 221

> Otherwise, there's a myriad of support options available which are completely free. Think of irc, forums, bug trackers, documentation, the various project sites, etc.

Insufficient. From home user through the 'mom & pop', all the way to the upper end of the small business... the users have to be able to pick up a phone and get support - including on site - or it's too much risk for them.

Comment Re:All the police have to do is (Score 1) 74

It's worse than that. They can carry the official force-issued cell phone and keep their own as well. And presumably if they're bad enough, there's no record of the personal phone because they bought it with and top it up with cash 'just in case'.

But police radio's been getting quiet and less interesting for years now anyway as they switch to mobile apps for the majority of dispatch uses.

Comment Re:I've been mocked for saying it for years (Score 4, Insightful) 245

Handguns were once 'the great equalizer', giving the power of a soldier to the common man, and not really requiring a great deal of skill or strength to use. You still need the nerve, and you're still going to be in a dangerous situation.

With a drone, I could have it fly to wait on somebody's roof for them to come home, use license plate and facial recognition for target confirmation, and then shoot them in the face as they walk to their front door.

It's horrifying. It's also equality in a way that handguns could never supply. Anybody with access to an electronics store and the Internet can do it with some effort.

Comment I've been mocked for saying it for years (Score 5, Insightful) 245

Everything you need has been out there for a long time. The reason we're not drowning in a sea of drone-based terror attacks is that most people just want to live and aren't actually interested in killing anyone until they get motivated to do so.

Ukraine's motivated. As impressed as I am by what they've achieved, I'm surprised we haven't seen more autonomous weaponry. The tools already exist to geofence a drone so you can be confident that as it goes on its killing spree, it's doing so in an area you have declared free of invalid targets. A drone dropping silently from altitude to 360 no-scope Russian soldiers as it randomly dances around to make it hard to hit is something I'd expected to happen by now.

Slashdot Top Deals

"I got a question for ya. Ya got a minute?" -- two programmers passing in the hall

Working...