Comment I will admit (Score 2) 53
There is a part of me that is ever so slightly disappointed that they didn't emerge from the capsule wearing ape masks.
There is a part of me that is ever so slightly disappointed that they didn't emerge from the capsule wearing ape masks.
What if we enacted policies to make having children, you know, affordable?
Let's say that Elon is right and the economics of space-based solar energy make the expense of launching into orbit worthwhile. Let's also say that we manage to avoid the Kessler Syndrome that Elon's companies have largely helped to make more dire.
Compute generates heat. Lots and lots of heat. And heat is difficult to dump in space. How does he plan to get around that not insignificant engineering problem?
I'm not saying it's impossible. I'm saying it's not going to happen in three years.
For some reason people can't seem to grasp that the I in AI is an emergent property, not a programmed behavior.
Yeah, that would be cool if AI chatbots were actual Artificial Intelligence and what you saw was an emergent property. But even though chatbots SOUND more intelligent that a vast segment of the population, they aren't intelligent, in the way that a true Artificial Intelligence would be. Also, you aren't seeing any kind of emergent property, it's a working prototype of an existing sound based communication framework called GGWave. There's even an Arduino library if you want your esp32 projects to all talk to each other using sound.
I'm not sure if this is any "emergent" behavior of ML, or if it is simply a part of the training data the ML model is making use of.
I was thinking the same thing. There had to be some prior training on the concepts or hacking, or even the simple fact that both the chess ML and the 'opponent' are enclosed systems that can be altered to change their actions.
Maybe you should shut up and learn about statistics.
I strongly suspect these researchers used the same methodology that was used successfully in WW2 to estimate the total number of German tanks based on the serial numbers of ones that had been captured or destroyed. Math works.
The unique identifier that YouTube uses for videos is a randomly generated 11 character string, there's no sequence, so you can't extrapolate.
IBM Advanced Systems Group -- a bunch of mindless jerks, who'll be first against the wall when the revolution comes... -- with regrets to D. Adams