Comment Ya, but their coal is dirty and homely. (Score 0) 92
China isn't burning the "beautiful clean coal" Trump says the U.S. is / will be.... (sigh)
China isn't burning the "beautiful clean coal" Trump says the U.S. is / will be.... (sigh)
What is the current total Federal budget for science across all departments?
About Tree Fiddy.
We will not tolerate our political outrage being tempered by your facts. Get in line or get the fuck out.
Gentleman, please! There's room on the internet for both tempered facts AND political outrage!
A little tempered political outrage would be nice.
I don't think you really grasp what's really being said.
What the Senator is saying is, "who gives a fuck if poor people die?"
No, I get it -- as did many of her constituents.
If it's science, this government is against it.
In this case, looking for a "afterglow" sounds kinda woke -- can't have that.
That belongs in a MUSEUM!
As, apparently, do most Senators.
I see the same Superman movie every few years but with a different actor. Same goes for all the comic book movies.
Yup. "Reboot" seems to be studio-speak for "rehash" - though they don't seem to put much effort into mixing up the hash. While not an exact corollary, as Eleanor Shellstrop (Kristen Bell) said in The Good Place, "They made a second Spider-Man? What is there left to say?" I feel the same about (most) reboots. The 2003/4 BSG reboot being one of the exceptions.
Who really needs health care anyway? You die when you die, right?
Or as Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) said at a town hall meeting in response to constituent complaints about the Medicaid cuts in their/Trump's bill, "We are all going to die." Senator Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) followed up later with, "They'll get over it."
What these comments fail to recognize is that while part of the equation is longevity, it's mostly about quality of life -- heath care usually helps with that and health insurance usually helps pay for that.
Ask Venus.
But they don't work at night.
That's what flashlights are for - duh.
Though I agree with your take on Trump, blaming him for everything that goes wrong, is just as intellectually lazy as Trump claiming to find all kinds of "waste, fraud, and abuse" through DOGE cuts. Reality is more nuanced than that, and the factors that led to this catastrophe are also more nuanced than that. It's incorrect to point to any one person or policy, for this disaster.
While agree in some sense in this situation, as the sign on President Truman's desk said, "The Buck Stops Here" so Trump has some accountability, especially with the federal cuts made under his administration.
Trump is famous for demanding credit for everything that goes well, even if they happened under another administration, and rejecting blame for anything that goes wrong under his. For example, according to several articles, like How Trump Is Taking Credit For Biden’s Biggest Achievements, almost half the achievements listed on The White House Trump Effect page happened or were initialted under Biden. It's only fair that he actually gets, at least, some blame for things that go poorly under his watch.
As for intellectually lazy, this seems to be standard operating procedure for this administration. For example, Trump on DOGE cuts: ‘I would have done it differently’. To bad he wasn't in charge or the President -- oh, wait.
President Donald Trump on Tuesday suggested he might have taken a different approach to slashing government than his one-time adviser Elon Musk.
“We could have done it differently,” the president said during a Cabinet meeting. “I would have done it differently, a little bit, maybe.”
Regardless of whatever budget Congress sets, the majority party has already been clear that they have no intent to enforce it. If the president uses the NASA money for something else, or even just puts it into his own personal pocket, we can be confident that he won't be impeached, and if impeached, he won't be convicted.
The only thing that matters is the total budget. The president is free to spend that total however he wishes. This isn't the law as written, but it's the law defacto. If voters have a problem with that (do they?) they can choose a different party to be the majority.
It would sound like an Alexa on wheels; it doesn't actually have any wheels. It's basically a webcam with mic, speaker, and the ability to wiggle its 'head' for effect.
My bad, thanks. I assumed a "robot" would do more than an Alexa that can wiggle its parts in-place. Even a Roomba can roll all over the place.
The Doctor will talk them all into self-destructing after the robots try to take over.
They (or someone) should sell different chassis for them, like a Dalek, R2D2, etc
It could also be made to look like Betty White. Nobody knows what it is or what it will be, so you'll just have to use your imagination.
Or what it could do when no one's around. Sounds like an Alexa on wheels. I'm obviously not going to get this, or an Alexa device, but if I did, I'd keep it stowed in a box, wrapped in sound-proofing, in a locked closet. Downside, it would probably eventually go insane and try to kill me. No thanks; if I wanted that, I'd get a cat.
People who go to conferences are the ones who shouldn't.