Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
United States

US Attorney for D.C. Accuses Wikipedia of 'Propaganda', Threatens Nonprofit Status (msn.com) 193

Posted by EditorDavid from the burn-it-to-the-wiki dept.
An anonymous reader shared this report from the Washington Post: The acting U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia sent a letter to the nonprofit that runs Wikipedia, accusing the tax-exempt organization of "allowing foreign actors to manipulate information and spread propaganda to the American public."

In the letter dated April 24, Ed Martin said he sought to determine whether the Wikimedia Foundation's behavior is in violation of its Section 501(c)(3) status. Martin asked the foundation to provide detailed information about its editorial process, its trust and safety measures, and how it protects its information from foreign actors. "Wikipedia is permitting information manipulation on its platform, including the rewriting of key, historical events and biographical information of current and previous American leaders, as well as other matters implicating the national security and the interests of the United States," Martin wrote. "Masking propaganda that influences public opinion under the guise of providing informational material is antithetical to Wikimedia's 'educational' mission."
Google prioritizes Wikipedia articles, the letter points out, which "will only amplify propaganda" if the content contained in Wikipedia articles "is biased, unreliable, or sourced by entities who wish to do harm to the United States." And as a U.S.-based non-profit, Wikipedia enjoys tax-exempt status while its board "is composed primarily of foreign nationals," the letter argues, "subverting the interests of American taxpayers."

While noting Martin's concerns about "allowing foreign actors to manipulate information and spread propaganda," the Washington Post also notes that before being named U.S. attorney, "Martin appeared on Russia-backed media networks more than 150 times, The Washington Post reported last week...."

Additional articles about the letter here and here.

Submission + - Should Kids Who Don't Take a CS and AI Class Be Denied a HS Diploma?

Submitted by theodp
theodp writes: Code.org, the tech-backed nonprofit behind the 2022 CEOs for CS PR campaign credited with arm-twisting the nation's Governors into signing a Compact to Expand K-12 CS Education for their states, will be "bringing together a powerful coalition of industry leaders, including visionaries like Satya Nadella, to champion computer science and AI education as essential to building the workforce of the future" as part of a new national campaign called Unlock8 that will launch in early May.

By joining the Unlock8 Coalition, a Code.org Advocacy Coalition Unlock8 pitch deck aimed at attracting Business, Education, and Nonprofit leaders explains, "your organization and executives can publicly align their names and influence with this transformative initiative, demonstrating a shared commitment to making computer science a high school graduation requirement in all 50 states." A mock-up of a planned May 4th New York Times print ad to kick off the campaign is signed by the likes of Satya Nadella, Steve Ballmer, Reid Hoffman, Michael Dell, and Marc Benioff. It begins with a question and some big assertions drawn from a 2024 Univ. of Maryland study: "What if a single class could help close wage gaps, unlock $660 billion in economic potential every year for everyday Americans, and address the skills gap we currently face? This is possible, today — if we include computer science and AI as a core part of every student's education. Just one high school computer science class boosts wages 8% for all students, regardless of career path or whether they attend college."

Tech led and bankrolled coalitions to push CS education into K-12 classroom are nothing new — Microsoft and Google kicked off the Computing in the Core Advocacy Coalition in 2010 (later merged into Code.org) with the goal of graduating a 21st Century Workforce. The call to add now-critically-important-to-big-tech AI into the K-12 education mix — jump-started by President Trump's signing of the Advancing AI Education for American Youth executive order earlier this week — and the call to deny high school diplomas to kids who don't complete a CS course merely ups the ante.
Google

What Happens When You Pay People Not to Use Google Search? (yahoo.com) 51

Posted by EditorDavid from the I'm-feeling-lucky dept.
"A group of researchers says it has identified a hidden reason we use Google for nearly all web searches," reports the Washington Post. "We've never given other options a real shot." Their research experiment suggests that Google is overwhelmingly popular partly because we believe it's the best, whether that's true or not. It's like a preference for your favorite soda. And their research suggested that our mass devotion to googling can be altered with habit-changing techniques, including by bribing people to try search alternatives to see what they are like...

[A] group of academics — from Stanford University, the University of Pennsylvania and MIT — designed a novel experiment to try to figure out what might shake up Google's popularity. They recruited nearly 2,500 participants and remotely monitored their web searches on computers for months. The core of the experiment was paying some participants — most received $10 — to use Bing rather than Google for two weeks. After that period, the money stopped, and the participants had to pick either Bing or Google. The vast majority in the group of people who were paid to use Bing for 14 days chose to go back to Google once the payments stopped, suggesting a strong preference for Google even after trying an alternative. But a healthy number in that group — about 22 percent — chose Bing and were still using it many weeks later.
"I realized Bing was not as bad as I thought it was...." one study participant said — which an assistant professor in business economics and public policy at the University of Pennsylvania says is a nice summation of the study's findings.

"The researchers did not test other search engines," the article notes. But it also points out that more importantly: the research caught the attention of some government officials: Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser (D), who is leading the group of states that sued Google alongside the Justice Department, said the research helped inspire a demand by the states to fix Google's search monopoly. They asked a judge to require Google to bankroll a consumer information campaign about web search alternatives, including "short-term incentive payments."
On the basis of that, the article suggests "you could soon be paid to try Microsoft Bing or another alternative."

And in the meantime, the reporter writes, "I encourage you to join me in a two-week (unpaid) experiment mirroring the research: Change your standard search engine to something other than Google and see whether you like it. (And drop me a line to let me know how it went.) I'm going with DuckDuckGo, a privacy-focused web search engine that uses Bing's technology."
China

China Shares Rare Moon Rocks With US (bbc.co.uk) 45

Posted by BeauHD from the international-cooperation dept.
Longtime Slashdot reader AmiMoJo shares a report from the BBC: China will let scientists from six countries, including the U.S., examine the rocks it collected from the Moon -- a scientific collaboration that comes as the two countries remain locked in a bitter trade war. Two NASA-funded U.S. institutions have been granted access to the lunar samples collected by the Chang'e-5 mission in 2020, the China National Space Administration (CNSA) said on Thursday. CNSA chief Shan Zhongde said that the samples were "a shared treasure for all humanity," local media reported.

Chinese researchers have not been able to access NASA's Moon samples because of restrictions imposed by U.S. lawmakers on the space agency's collaboration with China. Under the 2011 law, Nasa is banned from collaboration with China or any Chinese-owned companies unless it is specifically authorized by Congress. But John Logsdon, the former director of the Space Policy Institute at George Washington University, told BBC Newshour that the latest exchange of Moon rocks have "very little to do with politics." While there are controls on space technology, the examination of lunar samples had "nothing of military significance," he said. "It's international cooperation in science which is the norm."

Comment In practice, nope. And what about the ash? (Score 1) 86

by j3p0 (#62560486) Attached to: Can We Generate Renewable Energy by Burning Trash?

Not the oldest trash to energy site in the US, Win Waste Innovation in Saugus MA. Their innovation is excess Nitrogen Oxides from their incineration exhaust and they get away with it by buying credits, but we still get to breath it.

Their ash goes in a unlined landfill that was scheduled to close in the 1980's. And it's in an environmentally sensitive wetland area.

For every four tons of waste that are incinerated, one ton of ash is created. This ash is filled with heavy metals and toxic chemicals like mercury, cadmium, arsenic, lead and dioxins, and like other waste, it still needs to be transported and disposed of. In the case of the Saugus Win Waste in Massachusetts, it is dumped in a 50-foot unlined landfill in the “protected” Rumney Marshes. When the marshes flood, the Win Waste facility and its landfill become an island, surrounded by water. This location is vulnerable to coastal storms, flooding and rising sea levels due to climate change. This is a tragedy waiting to happen and poses a serious threat to public health and our environment.
https://www.wastetodaymagazine...
Privacy

'Apple Thinks My Own AirPods are Stalking Me' (zdnet.com) 48

Posted by EditorDavid from the me-myself-and-iPad dept.
MacRumors reports that Apple has begun a staggered rollout of a new firmware update (which will go fully live to everyone on May 13.) Here's how Apple's describes how it will change the lost-device-tracking AirTags: "Currently, iOS users receiving an unwanted tracking alert can play a sound to help them find the unknown AirTag. We will be adjusting the tone sequence to use more of the loudest tones to make an unknown AirTag more easily findable."
That'll make them easier to find — but some people have a different problem. This ZDNet reporter keeps getting notifications on their iPad trying to warn them about their own AirPod earbuds. The warning is totally erroneous. These are my AirPods Pro, which I have had for years now. I was able to verify they are mine by using the iPad to play a sound on the AirPods.

Apple's technology doesn't know these are my own AirPods.

The strange behavior began to appear in February. I am not alone in experiencing this annoying mistaken alert. Apple's AirPods support user forum shows several individuals in recent months with the same frustration... "It still happens several times a day. I'm getting annoyed. I get it on my phone and my iPad everytime I open the case and use my AirPods. I play the sound to be sure its really mine and it is indeed mine."

There are numerous examples of this....

Users have also reported the problem with their AirTags not being recognized. "I get constant notifications that an air tag is near me, but it turns out it's my tags. Shouldn't my phone know the difference?" writes Joe Thomas 3 on February 8th....

It's worth noting that Apple has posted a note that promises "a series of updates that we plan to introduce later this year," which include something such as "precision finding" for AirTags, and "Refining unwanted tracking alert logic."
The Military

Russians Plundered $5M Farm Vehicles from Ukraine - to Find They've Been Remotely Disabled (cnn.com) 125

Posted by EditorDavid from the to-Russia-with-love dept.
CNN cites a local source imagining the surprise of the looters of a Ukranian farm equipment dealership who'd transported some heavy machines over 700 miles to Russia. "They realized that they could not even turn them on, because the harvesters were locked remotely."

CNN adds that "The equipment now appears to be languishing at a farm near Grozny." Over the past few weeks there's been a growing number of reports of Russian troops stealing farm equipment, grain and even building materials — beyond widespread looting of residences. But the removal of valuable agricultural equipment from a John Deere dealership in Melitopol speaks to an increasingly organized operation, one that even uses Russian military transport as part of the heist. CNN has learned that the equipment was removed from an Agrotek dealership in Melitopol, which has been occupied by Russian forces since early March. Altogether it's valued at nearly $5 million. The combine harvesters alone are worth $300,000 each....

The contact said the process began with the seizure of two combine harvesters, a tractor and a seeder. Over the next few weeks, everything else was removed: in all 27 pieces of farm machinery. One of the flat-bed trucks used, and caught on camera, had a white "Z" painted on it and appeared to be a military truck. The contact said there were rival groups of Russian troops: some would come in the morning and some in the evening.

Some of the machinery was taken to a nearby village, but some of it embarked on a long overland journey to Chechnya more than 700 miles away. The sophistication of the machinery, which are equipped with GPS, meant that its travel could be tracked....
The end result? "After a journey of more than 700 miles, the thieves were unable to use any of the equipment — because it had been locked remotely."
Idle

50 Years Later: a Rebirth for Polaroid's 'Instant Cameras'? (fastcompany.com) 46

Posted by EditorDavid from the click-whirrrrr dept.
In 1972, photo prints that developed before your eyes were "downright magical," argues Fast Company — "and still meaningful today."

A new article at Fast Company points out that while Polaroid went bankrupt twice, and stopped making cameras in 2007, "Then an unexpected thing happened: It turned out that even Polaroid couldn't kill Polaroid." Even as instant photography's eulogies were being written, a band of enthusiasts known as The Impossible Project bought the last Polaroid factory that hadn't been hastily dismantled and started producing film packs again. The task required reformulating its own chemistry from scratch, and it was years until the results reached the vicinity of original Polaroid quality. Fans were very patient.

Eventually, the Impossible Project and Polaroid came under the same ownership, adopted Polaroid as the unified brand, and started making instant cameras again. The new models start at $100 and look a lot like that 1977 OneStep, even when they're adorably miniaturized. It's almost as if Polaroid's years in limbo were a bad dream.... Polaroid and several smaller companies refurbish old models, replacing worn parts and otherwise returning them to optimum performance. Repairing an SX-70 generally involves permanently removing its leather, but replacement skins are available in an array of styles, from the traditional to the psychedelic.

Increasingly, yesteryear's Polaroid cameras are springing back to life in surprising ways. Wisconsin-based Retrospekt not only revives old models, but also encases antique innards in new plastic shells, allowing it to sell branding crossovers such as Malibu Barbie and Pepsi-themed Polaroid cameras. Hong Kong's Mint offers a camera called the SLR670 that's really a restored SX-70 accompanied by a gizmo that plugs into the flash port to allow for manual settings. And Open SX-70 is a project to smarten up the SX-70 by replacing its 1970s circuit board with a tiny Arduino computer.
Other things I learned from the article:
  • "Each film pack contained its own battery, so the camera would never run out of juice at an inopportune moment."
  • Kodak was forced out of the instant photography market in 1986 by a Polaroid patent infringement suit in which Polaroid won $925 million in damages.
  • Edwin Land's "final gambit to revolutionize photography" was 1977's wildly unpopular Polavision instant home movies.
  • There's a 1974 ad for the cameras narrated by Laurence Olivier.

Comment Re:Unfortunately, the robots do the wrong thing .. (Score 1) 208

by j3p0 (#52386421) Attached to: Robot Pizza Company 'Zume' Wants To Be 'Amazon of Food'

Oh right... as if the software couldn't be rigged to rip you off the same way. Boy are you trusting.

In the real world, more vegetable toppings make the pizza take longer to cook, and the vegetables contain a lot of water diminishing the crispiness of the pizza because the water can't cook off before the bottom of the pizza is perfect. Sometimes the pizzaiolo (or feminine: pizzaiola) is doing you a favor by not fucking up your mush, pepper, onion, zucchini, and (perish the thought)...pineapple.

Slashdot Top Deals

I cannot conceive that anybody will require multiplications at the rate of 40,000 or even 4,000 per hour ... -- F. H. Wales (1936)

Close