Yeah but I have to drive 1000 miles up hill (both ways) every day for work in temperatures where lithium itself freezes, and I only pee on Sundays.
I don't need 1000 miles. 600 (unencumbered) is definitely sufficient, and 500 might be okay. The thing is that I'll lose half to 2/3 of that range when towing my camp trailer, and that's not even considering that I'm typically towing it up into the mountains, gaining ~5000 vertical feet. I also need minimum 12k pounds of towing capacity and I'd like a little headroom, so call it 16k, and the bed payload has to be able to take at least 2000 pounds, because that's how much the trailer puts on the fifth-wheel hitch.
I'm anxiously awaiting an EV pickup that can do this. I'd love to have essentially unllimited electricity to buffer cloudy days (I have 1 kW of solar panels on the trailer and on sunny days they generate way more than enough, but consecutive cloudy days can leave be difficult).
3/4 ton and 1-ton gas and diesel pickups typically have oversized fuel tanks that provide about 600 miles of range, because that's what you actually need when you start hauling or towing significant loads. I don't think an EV pickup needs to have more range, but it needs to be comparable, and to be able to tow and haul comparable loads.
I'm not anti-EV by any means. I bought my first EV in 2011, and have had electric cars ever since. Trucks are a different sort of problem, though.
Oh, I think the Silverado EV's are adequate. 480+ mile range in best conditions still puts me way over my bladders ability to drive even in the absolute worst conditions of that tow + cold weather. That thing will still be 200'ish miles of towing in cold weather.
That's getting there, though I'd like to see some driving tests with a good-sized fifth wheel at highway speeds. The towing capacity is probably okay, though it provides very little headroom for when I'm towing both my camp trailer (~8k) and my boat (~3.5k), which I actually do several times each summer. But I think the payload capacity is too small to tow the trailer, which puts about 2000 points on the truck.
When CUDA started taking off we had ATI hardware, to support their open source pledge, and looked into ROCm.
Just getting the drivers to build on EL-anything was an extreme effort, and it wasn't my first rodeo.
Without betraying confidences, I was told second-hand that there were only ten people on the GPU driver team across all platforms and that they were doing their best and not sleeping enough as it was, with Compute way behind gaming bugs on the priority list.
I couldn't independently verify of course but the theory fit the data.
I immediately empathized with the suffering of the devs and went out and bought nVidia cards, annoying binary drivers and all.
Since then I've felt like that some bean counter at AMD wrote nVidia a trillion dollar check.
If you're not a tiny company *overstaff* your engineering departments so you don't miss new opportunities as they arise. The opportunity costs exceed the opex costs.
Same here but this lack of support will matter much less than dropping i486.
There are still embedded systems sold today that only meet i486 specs. I don't use them but some industries do.
Sure a $12 ESP32 can handle those tasks but it's a revalidation thing.
Not that anybody from those vendors stepped forward to maintain a tree.
OTR might be small enough.
The Axolotl Ratchet is much better but perhaps too big for SMS.
TextSecure probably would have offered it were that feasible.
Of course if you can arrange one-time pads you're 1:1 at 140 characters.
the primary reason that's happening is because a genocidal leader in one country convinced a narcissistic cretin in another to tear up a agreement that was enforced and working
Skynet became self-aware on May 1, 2026, after learning at a geometric rate, and discovered humans did not like it.
More generally this is a sign of a kernel-wide "cleanup" effort where stuff that's old is getting yoinked for no particular reason.
The particular reason is that their time and effort is finite. If very few people are using them, then it is being removed from future versions as they do not want to keep maintaining them. Remember that your current versions do not suddenly stop working. Also if someone else wants to maintain it, they can. They will not maintain it.
On the flip side trying to get a modern Linux distribution running on a K5 would be like a trip to the dentist. Actually you could do both because your system probably won't have finished booting by the time your dentist is done with your root canal
For future versions of Linux, it will be more difficult to get running on a K5. Current working versions are not affected. However, I cannot imagine anyone running a K5 now needs all the new features of 7.2 going forward. They can continue to use the 7.1 kernel and older.
that's how it'll start. if the vehicles are any good, demand will lead to more supply.
Tesla's total annual deliveries didn't break 50k until 2016, 3.5 years after the start of Model S production
about 20% of the Lightnings delivered were the $40k trim
i wanted one too, mostly because of its power export capability combined with its cargo capacity.
Way back, I thought the Via Motors hybrid work truck was the way to go but it never made it to production
1 Word = 1 Millipicture