What's "so special" abou this is that Getty is one of the largest single copyright holders in the world and they know the licensing status of every piece of media in their collection, so any AI trained on those images is guaranteed liability-free for their clients."
the monetization schema is bullshit - it looks like the tiktok model where there's a giant pool of money split between all the creators every year with the size of that pool determined by "business growth" (ie in a way that prioritized the business and hands the remains to the creators) PLUS bits of the youtube model of constantly shifting goals and targets to keep planning ability for its creators at a minimum - but if you want to know why this AI that rips off artists is "better" than the rest, that's why.
ARS' spin is fucking gross, nothing in the actual article says anything close to what that headline is implying.
On the other hand, Amazon is buying rights to sports, which are so extravagant they can only be seen as loss leaders to gain subscribers. It is money down the drain.
The courts do expect seller to deliver the product
I know that for some, this is how they make their livelihood. But seriously, most of these, even
What is key is the body is discovered in 24 hours instead of days after the cat has eaten the body.
Depending on the complexity of the robot and expectations it might be ok.
National Geographic and the swimsuit issue was the only outlet for repressed Christian boys. Going to the barn or bathroom to get relief.
I think they realize that now that Biden is giving free internet p0rn to every kid in America they have no purpose.
Science may someday discover what faith has always known.