Transplant tourism is a real thing.

What an utterly naive interpretation of world history you have. I can assure you, if you'd been a Jew being rounded up for extermination in WW2 you'd have a different opinion. Likewise, if you were Chinese or Korean being subjugated by Imperial Japan, you'd have a different perspective. There is such a thing as a "just war" even though you somehow ignore the concept. It's usually when your opponent starts the war and is hell bent on eradicating you and your way of life.

Alas, you sit there in perfect safety and comfort, passing judgement on those who sacrificed fa more than you can ever imagine so you could impugn their sacrifices.

Banned for who? And who's going to enforce this ban?

You have to remember any treaty (a) must have signatories that agree to follow it and (b) there must be a method of enforcement. If you lack either of these two conditions, the treaty has no effect.

Not sure how you think you could pull that off, but whatever.

Again...exactly how do you plan to accomplish this? It's not like Iran hasn't been firing missiles at our carriers this whole time. Yeah, it's a halfhearted effort by the Iranians, but what exactly do you think would happen to Iran if you managed to even damage one of our carriers, much less sink one? I can describe it thusly: the American gloves would come off. Iran would be plastered into oblivion via conventional bombardment, and there's very little Iran could do to stop it. Sure, we'd take losses, but the Iranian regime would cease to exist in totality. America has had this option available to it since day one. We haven't exercised it. Not because we couldn't do it but because we chose not to. Do not mistake restraint for a lack of capability.

It's in the summary.

You should go find out, then let me know.

Yeah it's actually perfectly fine for daily use if anyone actually cared to try it. Even "less competent" programmers would figure it out with not much time.

These days we mostly choose languages for library availability, not for features of the language.

In science,the way "wrongness" is fixed is by experiment. The only way to decide one way or the other is to collect more data.

The summary says the data was wrong, and the camera system reported he was present when he was not.

Not from you, that's for sure.

Thanks.

Forget about relying on people.

Rely on facts. That's the scientific way.

"Got a designer baby, but I'm a good parent so I won't vaccinate that kid."

Some people are able to read scientific studies and understand them to figure out what is true or what is not.

A large segment of the population is unable to read much at all, and relies on consensus to determine what is true and what is not. So when there's a question, they ask all their friends, their therapist, their husband, people around them, and get people on their side.

The people in the second group are VERY confused about life, but they are too large a segment of the population to ignore.

No.