With the usual crap desktop and lack of keyboard navigation? Just asking. Also with the usual 100% project ownership and lack of interest in user feedback? Thanks, but no thanks.

Are you sure about that? Newsweek says from 65 million to 80 million housing units across China are estimated to be empty

Tesla needs an answer to this, to keep their stock fraud going. Remember when robotaxi was going to justify Tesla's P/E being twenty times too high?

Considering that TSLA is overvalued by arguably 95%, based on fundamentals, any institution that buys into it or even holds it must be engaged in some kind of fraud. Either that or criminal negligence.

Right. Windows reboot sounds coming out of manager's offices is a clear signal to put on your parachute.

Selling out to IBM was the continuation of the end you mean. The beginning of the end for redhat was when they cancelled their desktop distribution in 2003.

Sugar is fine if you limit it to less than 10% of calorie intake, ideally 5%, in which case it can be an excellent energy source. Just make sure you use that energy. Combine with other foods to avoid insulin spikes.

I'm viewing you more as a moron selfishly craving affirmation of their destructive metastabook habit.

Putting your business into the hands of Metastabook seems like an incredibly bad business decision.

Friends don't let friends use Metastabook. Remember, Metastabook's entire business model is based on reinforcing your negative thoughts.

OK, here come the paid Metastabook social media troll downvotes. Rotten organization from top to bottom.

Nonzero risk. Risk that exponentiates with number of reuses. Failing to factor that into launch costs is, in a word, fraud.

Give me a break. $9 million of non-fuel costs per launch is actually a big underestimate. Please knock off your embarrassing brownnosing.

I bet you're glossing over at least another $9 million costs per launch. Never mind the blowup risk. Also sounds like you're reading straight off an Elon Musk talking points card. "Launch costs will soon be no more than the fuel!" Glib. Doubtful.

Launches will cost only as much as the gas as soon as robotaxi makes a trillion dollars and optimum prime is operating vacuum cleaners in every living room.

That's just the point. It's not clear that Starship will ever be a cost effective means of delivering mass to orbit. Too much baggage.

I think you need to add "high payload" to your picking pot, because the latest Starship only managed to put 16 tonnes of payload into low earth orbit, whereas the ancient low tech Saturn V regularly did 140 tonnes, more than 8 times as much.