Exactly. The 0-60 time of any car is the last thing I consider. I need to go from 0-60 *once* in any trip I make. How well it copes with being driven flat out for 300 miles is a far more pressing concern.
I'll start looking at electric cars when they can produce one that takes no more than 60 quid to charge from fully flat, can carry four or five large adults plus their luggage plus at least 200kg of equipment, and can average no less than 100mph for 350 miles on a charge. That would be getting close to being able to replace my ordinary car, assuming it's actually nice to drive and doesn't give me a numb backside.
Your requirements are absurd. To summarize, a feasible replacement car for you must:
- take no more than 60 quid to charge (or fuel)
- carry 4 or 5 large adults + luggage + 200kg of equipment
- reliably handle being driven for 3 hours at 100mph (average speed) on a single trip
From these specifications I surmise your current "ordinary car" is substantially bigger, more powerful and more fuel efficient than any Range Rover (or equivalent).
Every car, electric or otherwise, is a compromise in Speed, Carrying Capacity and Cost (Price and Fuel Efficiency). Don't conflate your requirements when evaluating electric cars, look at your typical usage and go from there.
By the way, building an electric car with those specifications is well within the capabilities of current technology. However, I doubt that you would be willing (or able) to pay the price required.