Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:So, like Seiko, Kodak devised their own demise (Score 1) 28

Nikon failed when they tied themselves to niche formats like Apple's MOV video format.

And the value of a Nikon was always in the glass. Nobody cared as much about the Nikon camera body as they did about the Nikon glass. But seeing what they've done in the digital world, I'm never buying a Nikon again.

Canon did it much better. And it's the same with Leica and Hasselblad - the glass is the thing.

I've got a Mamiya RB67 and the lenses are glorious. So is the body and viewfinder. But a digital back is something like AUD$14K. So I will stick to film for now.

Comment Re:Cool (Score 1) 28

Wasn't his doing. Management couldn't get the $$$ signs out of their eyes to see the coming revolution.

Had they properly managed the IP licencing earlier, and invested in more R&D for digital technology, they'd have stayed at the top of the pile. They had the money to invest in digital, but they were too scared of losing sales of analog films.

Comment Re:Cool (Score 1) 28

Sales of film negative stock was very profitable. And Kodachrome, and ektachrome.

Plus movie films, and specialist films. The catalogue was huge.

Kodak films were expensive. They were good, though, and worth the money. Their range of colour films was extensive, much much more than what's available today.

And then there was the printing papers.Rolls and rolls and rolls and rolls of it for minilabs AKA kiosks.

Ilford ruled on B&W, and Agfa was a distant third (good quality, just didn't have the sales). And Cibachrome...... drool.

Film *was* messy and expensive, but the results were fantastic.

I should clarify that by saying the results *could be* fantastic. Point-and-shoot cameras, while convenient and lots of fun, left a lot to be desired WRT quality imaging. But they *were* a lot of fun to use at parties, even if the results weren't immediately available, there was an enjoyable anticipation for the results.

Comment Re:James Bond needs to drive an amazon delivery va (Score 1) 82

Q: "And this, Bond, is your pee bottle"

Bond: "My what?"

Q: "You can't stop and relieve yourself at any time during this mission, Bond, you MUST pee in the bottle!"

Bond: "Does it do anything else"

Q: "Yes, there's a laser in the cap, be careful - if you pee on the cap, you'll short-circuit the laser's battery and blow yourself up."

Comment Re: CVS has something call "Buy & Close" (Score 1) 106

That's great, good on you.

I joyfully anticipate your report on replacing banking and insurance mainframes with "non-mainframe strategies to zero-downtime, relative to the workload"

Or not. If banks, insurance companies, airlines, and others with a nine-nines uptime requirement could replace their mainframes with "non-mainframe strategies", I'd be happy to read about it.

Really? You don't think banks would have moved off the mainframe world if they had been able to find a replacement that was just as reliable for the same price or cheaper?

It's been decades, and it's never happened.

"The vast majority of no-downtime experiences in the modern era don't have mainframe involvement."

LOL. You have no idea.

Slashdot Top Deals

Always try to do things in chronological order; it's less confusing that way.

Working...