No matter how much you oppress people if they're starving to death they will act against you.
Then why is the Kim family still in power in North Korea?
You don't get to create and then destroy life just to prolong yours.
That's what you do every time you eat. Are you monstrous?
It is a monstrous suggestion.
Only Jainism opposes it.
Some people absolutely would want that responsibility and risk. But also, Starfleet is a military organization. They don't get a real choice in where they get assigned, outside of a few exceptions.
That just moves the question - you're in what is (at least through TNG-era eyes) a post-scarcity society. Why are you signing up for the military, to go get sent off random places and get eaten by negative space wedgies, when you could just replicate another bag of Cheetos?
Does it work?
Obviously - look at the laws in the 80s and 90s to prevent teenagers from getting access to tobacco, alcohol, dirty magazines and movies... we all know that parents and grandparents of today's teens didn't do any of those things growing up, right?
People probably made the same argument for the horse when the car was invented: "A horse requires no fuel. What if someone attacks you and the car runs out of fuel?"
I would be very surprised if someone had that argument when the car was invented. You're really stretching for this one.
The attack lasted around six minutes...San Francisco police officers showed up shortly after.
"Conversion, fastidious Goddess, loves blood better than brick, and feasts most subtly on the human will." -- Virginia Woolf, "Mrs. Dalloway"