While I agree with you, I can also believe that a percentage of the execs at AI companies do not value information to any degree.

I really wish if they were going to abuse the standards process, they would have come up with something more rational than the shadow dom. Abuse standards, introduce useless crap.

Too lame, DON'T read. Sorry for the inclarity.

Yeah, you just listed a bunch of programming languages. You didn't give any indication you actually enjoy them. Have the things in your list are just you insulting them.

Again, I don't think you enjoy programming. That's why you became a manager.

You have to tax or ban products that use difficult-to-recycle packaging. Waste has a negative value and negative externality. You can't let the free market fix the problem.

Some countries have a $2 of CRV equivalent. That's enough for people to put in the effort to recycle. Alternatively, you can require manufacturers to buy back the waste.

Directly subsidizing building of factories that make highly recyclable or compostable packaging is another option.

Durable goods don't really need recycling rules. We don't use enough for it to matter. Only large objects like cars and buildings need special waste handling.

Touching your passenger has all sorts of potential legal risks, even if most drivers don't realize it.

Self-driving taxis can just build a vibration function into the passenger seats. Once the passenger takes more than 5 minutes to leave, they should flag the ride for a human to check what's going on through the cameras.

An LLM is highly accurate if you provide the relevant text directly in its context. So if you want a better search, you can do RAG, which is use the LLM to generate search terms, pull the relevant text from a database, then use the LLM again to massage the result.

You very convincingly make it sound so fun.

You do realize it doesn't matter whether you like the ideology or not right? Only what the leadership in China thinks matters.

Unfortunately for them, the few examples of Communist dictatorships they can reference all failed, so as far as I can tell, they've gone back to what worked for the previous 2000 years.

That's for the people. For the government, it's about acting with moral virtue and taking care of the masses (so they're convinced to not revolt). You can contrast it with the main alternative government philosophy of the time, which is legalism (basically ruling with strict laws and crushing rebellions with force).

It's not just about popularity of the destination, it's about the ease of making the map, and the difficulty of traffic in the area. Waymo avoids roads that are too difficult to drive on, routing around them if possible.

Have you ever shot an animal?

tl;dr

I think you have a point you are trying to make, but I cannot figure out what you are trying to say here at all.

COBOL was "$Coding_technology" is so easy anyone can program!

I seriously doubt you enjoy programming in any language.