This is just a camera that makes sure the driver is looking forwards out the windscreen, and doesn't have their eyes closed or looking down at their phone for extended periods. The data isn't sent anywhere or recorded, there is no spying.

There is plenty of shit to be angry about, without making up more.

Is this actually true? I watched both Gamer's Nexus videos and while they mention that LG TVs can for nearby wifi networks, probably so they can geo-locate you, they don't actually connect to them or use them. Doing so would be very, very illegal in many countries.

I hate to defend LG, but there is enough to hang on them here without what appear to be unfounded claims.

Try disabling IPv6, it reduces that a lot.

Sounds like they don't work, it built a solver. Which is good news because once AI can easily defeat them they will go away and hopefully be replaced by something less annoying.

On a related note, website security is another nail in the coffin of IPv6, because it seems to hate IPv6 addresses. I often get blocked with it, switch to IPv4 only, and get right in.

China's emissions are down: https://www.carbonbrief.org/an...

The irony of all the climate change deniers claiming we would have to destroy our economies to address it, and now Trump is actually trying it. Meanwhile the commies are turning it into an economic boom with massive increases in both manufacturing and cheap energy to power the manufacturing.

Isn't that a good thing?

You are forgetting that the alternative to a passkey is a password.

Passwords can be stored in a password manager, where they have the same protections as a passkey. Or they can be stored in your brain, which will result in you either re-using them or forgetting them.

Therefore passkeys are the better choice, because they avoid things like stupid per-site limits on password complexity, have more bits of entropy than most websites allow in a password, and are overall a better experience for the user, while being at a minimum equally secure as passwords.

And if you don't want too allow them to be exported, get a hardware security key like a Yubikey and store them on there. Or just don't authorize export from your phone (it needs you enter your unlock password/biometric, apps can't just take the data).

Of course, you can still use 2FA with a passkey. You can even use a password as one of your authentication methods.

That's what I mean, yeah, a mirrorless. But I haven't found any that really seem to meet my needs of being compact, decently wide, good in low light, and good on auto. Maybe one of the Sony alpha series, but looking at phone like the Honor Magic 8 Pro and the coming 9 Pro, I'm not convinced that it is worth it.

It's about Europe having the ability to put a lot of mass into space without relying on other countries.

He was working on low mass low cost to orbit, but it seems that ride-share is going to be the preferred way to do that.

Records began in 1884.

So it's about as secure as other protected keys in smartphones, such as the ones use to encrypt the flash memory. Or in other words, it's very secure and only well funded government security services are likely to have the resources to do it.

I have been thinking about getting a DLSR for years, but stick with a phone. Carrying a DLSR means one more thing to pocket, one more thing to charge. They are also harder to use, and while they do have better sensors and optics, the actual photos are often no better, or only marginally so, compared to a really good phone.

I wish someone would make a DSLR that was compact and as easy to use as a phone. I'd be interested in that. Fixed lens would be okay, I'm not going to carry a second one anyway. Even just a USB dongle that used the phone for all the processing and for the view screen.

I am disappointed that Google has abandoned high end cameras and is now only a B+ compared to other flagships. iPhones are off the table because they aren't Android and are made by Apple, but when I do upgrade my Pixel the cameras will be the deciding factor on which device I get.

I'd like a folding phone, but there are two issues holding me back.

1. Fragility. The inner screens can still be damaged by a fingernail.

2. Cost.

I feel like the cost is at least partly down to poor design decisions. I don't need a camera under the outer screen and under the inner screen. An array of high end ones on the back is enough, and if I need to take a selfie/video chat I will just open the phone up and use the front screen.