Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:prices vs volume (Score 1) 47

< RAM> prices are going to drop ... unless big-data ( AI / LLM / data-center ) is hell-bent on removing personal computers from almost everyone.  Like the  early Mafia removed Italian crushed tomatoes and olive oil from Irish-owned markets. Early computer executives ( IBM / Dec etc ) thought the idea of widespread computer ownership was ridiculous ... not because relevant tasks didn't exist  ... but because they were certain large companies could keep the PCs out of the retail market. For 30 years  THEIR monopoly  succeed ... then they failed for 40 years ... now again compute power is retreating to the "cathedrals" of BIG DATA . Welcome to the Feudalistic compute age.

Comment Re:Cripes! (Score 1) 19

Academy was a great Trek show. It captured the spirit of Star Trek and showed us how Starfleet helps young people develop into officers, while also giving us some new and interesting ideas. The characters were interesting, the legacy stuff wasn't obnoxious and actually added to what came before (especially for The Doctor after what B'Lanna did to him), and the overall writing and presentation overall was good.

Sorry Ami, but I'm gonna have to give a bit of a counter here.

Starfleet Academy was referenced in TNG and DS9 as a prestigious institution, only accepting the best. Wesley Crusher and Nog were both shown as really needing to be at the top of their game in order to be accepted into the academy. In Academy...pretty much everything was "find yourself and who you feel you really are, and the team will work around that".

Meanwhile, the setup for the story was that Holly Hunter left Starfleet because she was upset about a particular mother and son (Caleb) she separated when she was a judge, so she left, and now Starfleet needs Her In Particular to be a professor at Starfleet Academy (really, a whole universe full of people and we need one person who wasn't a teacher and resigned?), and she goes to find Caleb In Particular to join Starfleet because he's good at everything, in exchange for helping him find his mother...except that the "find my mother" plot thread is barely there, and not even Caleb seems to care for most of the season.

As the show gets going, Starfleet Academy (the institution) takes place on a ship that can just land and be a building, depending on what's necessary...and they go on a bunch of super dangerous missions that really require seasoned officers to do, but they have a bunch of cadets doing stuff they clearly shouldn't be doing...for, some reason. And they go out in space to do it instead of doing it all on the holodeck where it's far safer for...some reason. And, somehow, they're almost never in class in this college, except for one episode where we watch them be in debate class. Okay, fine, but...no engineering classes? No tactical training? No indication that they're actually learning to do the things we've seen Starfleet officers doing in the field?

Most of the show centered around the interpersonal drama, and I'll even grant some leniency here because it was pitched as having a "Dawson's Creek / Harry Potter" sort of coming-of-age focus. uhm...okay, fine...but quite a number of episodes had so much of that sort of focus, that it barely needed to be "Star Trek" to do it. They brought in the 'war college' to create some allusion to the Harry Potter houses, but do we spend a meaningful amount of time with sympathetic characters in The War College? No, we don't. Do we have any meaningful thought put behind the possibility that perhaps there's a need for a military-focused part of Starfleet in a universe that has physics-defying pirates (the last episode requiring an impossible feat of travel and resource acquisition), the way that Enterprise had the MACO's or the Elite Force games had the Hazard Team? ...no, they should join Starfleet Academy instead, where we learn nothing because Caleb already knows everything, everywhere, ever! And SAM only needed to realize that she's wonderful and perfect and had nothing to learn at all, so of course she's a perfect candidate for an institution of higher learning!

Finally, at least for my personal opinion, I found absolutely every single character insufferable for one reason or another. Holly Hunter is a captain-slash-professor who tells her leadership to get bent, and is shocked when the cadets have authority issues? I forget her name, but the Jem Hadar lady was generally annoying and useless, and somehow I got the feeling that half the cadets could have taken her in hand-to-hand combat. Caleb was "the key to everything", Genesis was every popular girl trope simultaneously, Ja'den was the living embodiment of 'not-Klingon'. The writers were clearly going for 'child-like' with SAM, but ended up at 'child-ish' instead. Tig Notaro was Tig Notaro playing Tig Notaro. You get the point.

Please note that I got through my whole list of exceptions without complaining one bit about "wokeness" or "politics in Star Trek" or anything related to it.

Comment Re:Don't forget their product keeps trying to esca (Score 1) 79

Your so right. The fear-mongering by AI /LLM vendors  < this escape .... that attack ... another danger ... >  is almost comic, and has zero sense of embarrassment. AI will find a nitch(s) at 5% of market projected by its /devs & evangelists. Shame on them, but good for tfor us.  But, did the tek really require the ( near fraudulent ) massive over-reach in financials, effort and propaganda ? Kinda like M-Theory with semi-colons.

Comment maybe (Score 2) 128

Check the paper: < https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889157516302113 > .... the decrease in  vegetable nutrition may be small, while availability vastly increases.  Maybe it balances out. Of-course "food store" fruits and veggies taste like shite, compared to what you could pick  yourself.

Comment just no (Score 1) 135

Retired now, but this simplicity sticks in my craw and deserves to be called-out .  Read the "anti-solutions" paper on Navier-Stokes . They have chosen a special case of a special case namely : d<rho> = 0 ( incomprehensible ) is NEVER perfectly  true ... and  over any range of shear-gradients the viscous force  is NEVER linear. ... usually wildly so. So they say a non-existant fluid disobeys Navier Stokes.  An "exact" mathematical result that assumes an  inexact parameter choice is no proof to me.  Reminds me of anti-DeSitter space calculations / predictions  pretending to be "physics" ; instead it was a fairy-tail.

Comment Re:Risk reward and perverse incentives (Score 2) 47

All you constraints you advise are reasonable. I have no problem with "socialization of risk" ... as there IS nothing else, but social wants/needs. i would of-course strongly limit :"privatization of benefits".  Wealthy workers can  with great effort reclaim enshitified land. Citizens of my home-town of Scranton Pa got screwed-over by the mining interests, who took their profits from raping the beautiful valley ...  ditched the miners ... and left town. Scranton never recovered, and I suspect the same will be true for those providing energy/land for the LLM-farms.

Comment Re:Efficent code (Score 1) 66

Home and hobby users already have such an "efficient" system. My Debian-13 / MATE / Librewolf system running on  10 Y/O XEON-1240 / GF 3050 and 24-Gig DDR3 barely uses 15% of RAM during active surfing. Eight-cores are mostly asleep. I'd guess many of us non-gamers  have skipped the "RAMpocalypse". Granted , I'm on a slow WiFi network.

Comment Re:Risk reward and perverse incentives (Score 1) 47

A well-spoken argument ...  and to be balanced against the human desire for warmth in  icy winter and coolness in  roasting summer. Those are health,  productivity & agency  issues, crucial to risk/reward judgement, and  even more basic than toxic radiation. Stated crudely ... live like a savage or < threat of > die by radiation poisoning ... or coal-smoke ... of frack-contaminated water ... or three weeks of no sun & no wind ... or a huge solar-flare that takes out all common energy-producing electronics.  Indeed: the only case worth considering is the "worst case" ... because that's the one that kills you.  Thus ...  those  few who live unaccustomed to physical risk are poor judges of energy sourcing options.

Comment POS (Score -1) 165

Altman really is a sociopathic piece of shite; toxic as lead-sweetened wine.  Probably thinks HE is in good company. As a deep red social conservative,  I can see  -- thru Altmans' et. al. behavior -- the triggers  for rational "progressive" social views  & actions.  Damnable person.

Comment Re:The difference between a laboratory and a facto (Score 0) 70

"ye olde genetic bottleneck means all humans are fairly inbred"

Yes, this is standard dogma. And yet ... look around you . How many base-pair changes are required to change an average-human into a raving "mongoloid" ? Is that number 10^3  or  10^6 or ... just ... 10 ?  One unfortunate change in amino-acid sequence can destroy  an enzyme function. I know ... "...compared to other species..." , but that is not the issue.

Slashdot Top Deals

In 1869 the waffle iron was invented for people who had wrinkled waffles.

Working...