Comment next (Score 1) 72
Comment early adapters (Score 1) 28
Comment Re:No doubt Tr ump will treat it the same (Score 1) 106
Comment Re:Decreased obesity (Score 5, Insightful) 92
Comment Re:Move fast and break things!!!! (Score 1) 30
Comment Re: Bet against Elon if you like (Score 1) 165
Comment Re: its "limitations" (Score 1) 31
Currently i have to work with a program that doesn't work and costs 10K/ license/year. I've now created my own version that has global search, instant import, very good UI and instant save instead of a crashing heap of garbage. 20K lines of code, no imports. Sub second performance.
Yeah AI is here to stay and you can pry it out of my cold dead hands.
Comment Re:Can it spit flames violently? (Score 1) 24
Comment Re:Units (Score 2) 90
Comment Re:Silver linings (Score 5, Insightful) 90
Comment Re:Kilowatt (Score 1) 90
Comment Re:Self-healing materials (Score 1) 58
Comment Re:Two Things Can Be True (Score 1) 212
Comment Re:False Hope (Score 1) 93
If one actually reads the story, these engineers are being hired to complete training of AI that was incomplete due to earlier departures. The positions being filled, in this case, are very short term. They know up front that as soon as the AI training project is complete they are again redundant.
*engineers complete training of AI*
Management: "You've been promoted to customer!"
AI: *follows training, flags QA issues, slows production to ensure resolution*
Management: "The QA flags are slowing production too much!"
AI: "You're right! We need to increase production!"
Customers: "...this product failed miserably!" *files lawsuit*
Management: "The AI didn't do a good enough job flagging QA problems! Bring the engineers back to get it back to the point of avoiding the lawsuits!"
*engineers complete training of AI*