Comment Re:Governments don't have the right (Score 1) 124
It also doesn't say they can't do it.
This "AI" seems to be severely lacking in training, in that no superior/invincible force (e.g. a party simulating law enforcement) showed up and demonstrated the downside to taking certain actions.
Dammit, can't anyone make some stylish cyber-shoes? That looks like shit! Anyone who goes around upskirt-snapping with shoes like that, is going to get laughed out of the ballroom by all the snobs.
If data that you own is not personal property, then what is it?
This is like saying the words on a page are not personal property, but the paper is. No court would agree to that.
Personal property is anything you own or have possesion of, including intangibles such as stock or copyrights, that is not attached to land or fixed to real estate. Data on a phone falls within that definition. The phone is a physical item you own. It's your personal property. The data within the phone is also personal property, though intangible.
Is it ok if I show up in regular glasses, but where an always-on LED is attached to the one of the corners? (I understand pervs are falling out of popularity, but that doesn't mean we need to abandon the whole aesthetic!)
If it's on your phone, it's personal property. If you don't think it is, kindly explain who owns it.
Why do you need the degree if you have the followers?
If these events occur every 27.5 million years, when was the last one? From that we can anticipate the next one and see what happens.
Since the paper is behind a cookie wall, I can't read it, but I don't see anywhere where the previous event is noted.
I know it's marketing speak, but "influcencer" is just another name for shill. These people are trying to get you to buy something.
Do we really have to reinvent the wheel every damn time?! It used to be that you just got Voight-Kampff tested, and the administrator of the test would sign your PGP key. WTF was wrong with that?!
My first reaction is that if one company is selling at half the price, that company will go bankrupt at twice the speed since every transaction was already a money-loser. Customers are absolutely the worst thing for these "businesses."
But is revenue really significant? I can see how neither reducing the price to $0 or increasing their price to 10x what it was, might not really have much of a different impact on the bottom line, compared to all the debt.
The earth is like a tiny grain of sand, only much, much heavier.