Comment Re:The benefits of the surveillance state (Score 1) 60
Surveillance protects us all.
This would all be great if the police were benevolent.
Which county has benevolent police?
Surveillance protects us all.
This would all be great if the police were benevolent.
Which county has benevolent police?
Ooh, didn't notice I failed to properly close that quote tag
Oxford close quote tag.
Suspected Iranian attackers targeted water and wastewater facilities across at least a dozen states in July
Code for, "we don't know who it was, but calling them a state actor will distract from our poor security."
Those estimates are super low frequency though. I mean, hundreds of years between samples kind of low frequency.
Treating proxy data as if it is as useful as high frequency measurements in the modern satellite era is a category error.
Of course ENSO is a natural variation, and that it's not driven by human activity - it's literally circulation patterns of ocean heat that are hundreds of years long, untouched by industrialization.
I understand that the contention might be "well, our tiny fraction of human impact is going to be the straw that broke the camel's back on top of much more significant natural variation", but the truth is we don't have any really well supported evidence against natural variation - at best we have smoothed proxies that have lost resolution, and an otherwise very short observational period.
Now, I see being pissed at the boomers because of them building a welfare state that transfers all the wealth to themselves, stealing from the upcoming generations with inflation, taxation, unsustainable debt, and destructive social engineering against our shared american christian heritage. Even the natural climate change denial of the boomers is part of this selfishness.
The "New Deal" and "Great Society" and all the other socialist programs, including the "green new deal" were never a solution - they were a selfish programs that willfully cloaked themselves in faux compassion and charity, and destroyed communities, and virtue. Continuing the communist takeover only means that we're the ones giving the fuck you to the future, and pulling the ladder up after ourselves - there is no sustainable, involuntary application of "charity". Charity must be voluntary for it to work, and the failure of government interventions to force wealth transfers over the past 100 years has demonstrated that clearly.
The fact that the boomers have us focused on "climate change" is what lets them continue to extract wealth from future generations.
Especially since it's not clear what's in it for Iran. They're not at war with UK, but they are at war with US
They hit what they can. Iran has attacked or threatened many countries, including the UK.
It's understandable. If I were the head of the Islamist regime in Iran, I would be trying to build up nuclear weapons that could hit America as quickly as possible.
Simplicity does not precede complexity, but follows it.