Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment "minor detail": with a fixed end date (Score 1) 267

This article really caught my attention because I myself also rent privately, but fortunately I live in a part of the world that cares about its civilians and so I don't have an end-date in my contract, nor can the owner increase the rent unrestrictedly. - so I guess I'll just continue getting older from actual old age ;-)

Comment Re:No shit. (Score 1) 47

I think what is meant here (or at least, this is also my opinion): a company that doesn't trust its workers and wants to treat them like this will get no commitment from their staff, and they will lack any motivation to make this business a success. After all: it's the people that make the business, that talk to your customers, etc.

Aside from that, it should be illegal in the US as well.

Submission + - Steve Randy Waldman: The 1996 Law That Ruined the Internet (theatlantic.com)

An anonymous reader writes: The real problem with Section 230, which I used to strongly support, is the kind of internet it has enabled. The law lets large sites benefit from network effects (I’m on Facebook because my friends are on Facebook) while shifting the costs of scale, like shoddy moderation and homogenized communities, to users and society at large. That’s a bad deal. Congress should revise Section 230—just not for the reasons the president and his supporters have identified.

Slashdot Top Deals

Where there's a will, there's a relative.

Working...