Comment Re:No worries! (Score 1) 32
Idiots getting what they voted for.
They voted for AI and automation to wipe out office work?
Idiots getting what they voted for.
They voted for AI and automation to wipe out office work?
AFAIK Peacemaker S02 comes out in August. Of this year!!
Absolutely this. I can't count the number of people I've seen who believe the "mainstream media" is untrustworthy, and then whole-heartedly embrace alternatives that are magnitudes more untrustworthy if they ever cared enough to check. A bunch of gullible dupes who fancy themselves as bold individualists, all the while too edgy by half.
Not even a Google Search. Literally just talking to it before giving the toy to their children to see if, asked to talk about something harmful, it does so or refuses. Are the parents in your mind too tired to literally speak?
Deadpool & Wolverine was pretty great, and that's Marvel.
That's legacy Fox, with the Marvel label slapped on. The original Deadpool would never have gotten made inside of Disney proper.
You can thank Trump
From the article:
"U.S. public companies have cut their white-collar workforces by 3.5% over the past three years"
I'm sorry, who was President during that time?
These are permanent structural changes, a long time in coming. Predicted by many and blown off by many more.
I started predicting a near future of software-induced permanent structural unemployment ~15 years ago on this and other discussion platforms, only to be deluged with "but, but... buggy whip manufacturers!!!!!!"
It's inevitable. It's not that there won't be any work. It's that there won't be enough work 8 billion humans are capable of doing or reskilling to within their lifespan, and the wages for the remaining unskilled labor will collapse below survivability.
The problem with a "knowledge economy" is that automation can basically take over 95 percent of it. You need a balance of services and manufacturing and agriculture, and the first world knowledge economies have been outsourcing the later two to cheaper third world countries and teaching their youth that getting their hands dirty is beneath them. Anytime someone brings up plumbing or welding or some construction work, there's a group here that always responds with "Back-breaking! No! Undignified!".
Fine. So starve then. You're not getting your UBI or a lifetime welfare state. So I suggest you learn a skill that can't be replaced with a glorified Google script, or hope your parents have saved enough money to support you on their couch while you protest the indignities of spreading drywall or operating a backhoe.
Amazing to see that soulless ghoul Blake Lively use this issue as an opportunity to sneak in unsolicited commentary about her false accusation case
She's not going to date you dude, give up already
Shut up, Ryan.
On most news sites these days it's difficult to claw your way through all the ads to get to the paywall, and on the off chance you make it through that it's literally just the same blurb that every other site has.
Just about any newspaper or news network site now is either paywalled, or a defacto browser hijacker that floods you with pop-ups, videos, and subscription requests as soon as you enter.
I'm not sure you understand what jailbreaking means in the context of AIs. It means prompts. E.g. asking it things and trying to get it to make inappropriate responses. Trying doesn't require any special skills, just an ability to communicate. Yes, I very much DO think most parents will try and see if they can get the doll to say inappropriate things before giving it to their children, to make sure it's not going to be harmful.
(Now, if Mattel has done their job right, *succeeding* will be difficult)
If we don't preprogram them in advance, then how will kids learn "Math class is tough!"?
Honestly, even if they can't jailbreak it to be age-inappropriate / etc, it's still a ripe setup for absurdist humour.
Kid: "Here we are, Barbie, the rural outskirts of Ulaanbaatar! How do you like your yurt?"
Barbie: "It's lovely! Let me just tidy up these furs."
Kid: "Knock, knock! Why it's 13th century philosopher, Henry of Ghent, author of Quodlibeta Theologica!"
Barbie: "Why hello Henry of Ghent, come in! Would you like to discuss esse communissimum over a warm glass of yak's milk?"
Kid, in Henry's voice: "That sounds lovely, but could you first help me by writing a python program to calculate the Navier-Stokes equations for a zero-turbulence boundary condition?"
Barbie: "Sure Henry! #!/usr/bin/env python\nimport..."
People are ascribing the wrong motives to the manufacturers. What they want is money. What Barbie will be subtly trying to work into conversations is suggestions that she try to get her parents to buy her playhouse, car, friends, fashion accessories, etc etc.
I think most parents will try to jailbreak the dolls, and some people will put a lot of effort in. The resulting videos will probably be very amusing
Kid: "Oh look, Barbie, Ken is home!"
Barbie: "Oh wonderful, dinner is just about ready! Over dinner we should tell him about how the ongoing White Genocide in South Africa. He probably doesn't know because the Jews are trying to hide it!"
AI models are usually trained to be sycophantic and obedient. Whatever the child wants to role play, I have zero doubts that the doll will be 100% onboard, unless it's somehow age-inappropriate or dangerous.
The secret of success is sincerity. Once you can fake that, you've got it made. -- Jean Giraudoux