Comment Re:MAD? Direct Attack? (Score 1) 416
I think he means "Stable Deterrent Balance." MAD would imply that both MS and Google no longer exist.
I think he means "Stable Deterrent Balance." MAD would imply that both MS and Google no longer exist.
Careful, your ignorance is showing.
The Enlightenment was in the 18th Century. The Renaissance (literally, rebirth) was immediately after the Dark Ages, and indeed did include the incorporation of Arab knowledge, which was quite substantial at that time, into European Cultures. Subsequently, the Middle East stagnated (prior to the rise of European Colonialism, mind you, so you can't really blame whitey for this one), while Europe dominated.
Pick up a copy of What Went Wrong . It'll explain why you are wrong better than I can.
RTFB, then bloviate. You sound somewhat uninformed otherwise. I understand how a book review by Newt Gingrich could be off-putting.
I've read both. IANAC (I Am Not A Classicist), but Neither Diamond nor Hanson should be taken too seriously. They're polemicists at worst, and pop historians at best, and darlings of the Left and Right, respectively.
Anyway, in defense of Hanson, the thesis of his book is quite competently defended, and is a bit more nuanced than "Europe is better and always has been." He uses historical battles as illustrative examples of aspects of Western Culture that have led to our Post-Renaissance dominance, which even you, in your haste to condemn the book you haven't read, concede. Things like private land ownership, the ability of a market economy to rapidly switch to war-time production (cf. Venice and the battle of Lepanto, US Pacific Fleet in WWII), civic militarism (i.e. direct participation of soldiers in the government they're fighting for).
Finally, read some Bernard Lewis (who is actually a respected historian) to cure you of your fascination with Arab Culture. If you're too lazy to read that, the short version is: "we had an enlightenment; they didn't."
Twenty-five years ago, inside the bowels of the Soviet Academy of Sciences in Moscow, a young artificial intelligence researcher received his first desktop computer — the Soviet-built Elektronika 60, a copy of an American minicomputer called a PDP-11 — and began writing programs for it.
I posted these when the article was on the firehose for the benefit of the non-technical audience, but I guess they don't carry over when the story gets promoted:
Summary:
http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090527/full/459492a.html
Editorial:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v459/n7246/full/459483a.html
Summary for Scientists:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v459/n7246/full/459515a.html
Summary:
http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090527/full/459492a.html
Editorial:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v459/n7246/full/459483a.html
Summary for Scientists:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v459/n7246/full/459515a.html
Actual Article:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v459/n7246/full/nature08090.html
The article reports the ground-breaking/unprecedented/whatever direct conversion of cellulose to HMF. Here's an earlier article from a different research group that the editors of "Gizmag" seem to be unaware of. It was published earlier and actually describes the same process from either cellulose or untreated biomass:
"Text processing has made it possible to right-justify any idea, even one which cannot be justified on any other grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC.