I could be wrong, but I suspect when OpenAI and Anthropic warn us of all the bad things that their creations are up to, it's more a ploy to show us how supposedly powerful they are rather than really inform us of something wrong. If they're using their computers to break into other people's computers, they're criminals, not the overlords of some new, amazing technology.

You know, even though about a third of American seem to think so, I don't think the Chinese are pulling for the failure of America. The only people really working for the failure of America are those MAGA morons who back this garbage.

I don't use it.

I liked the first one better except that you're too lazy to hit the shift key from time to time.

Blah! Blah! Blah! Trump did something else moronic! Blah! Blah! Blah!

I've never met anybody or seen such a person on TV or anywhere else, who wanted to grow up and work in a call center. This is exactly where AI should make a positive impact. But we all know it won't happen. There's no indication that AI call centers bots are getting anywhere near intelligent or even particularly useful. We're still whacking away at the zero and screaming "I want to talk to a human".

We're not getting the whole story here. If he's up 80% for the year, he's still doing better than most of the commenters, me included. He's just riding a steeper roller coaster than most of us can stomach. Let's see where he's at in ten years and then judge. Granted, where he's at may include prison.

We don't need AI to find out about chemicals used in WW I. Unless you think Ai is just a good search engine.

Trust me. Ain't nobody gonna use AI to develop no stinkin' chemical weapons. Or, at least, any new ones. As far as I can tell, AI isn't doing too well at figuring out chemistry. And, speaking as a chemist, the data that one might use to train AI on chemistry and biology is already pretty highly corrupted on its own, thank you.

I'd still be using NT if I could. Every iteration is worse. Well, not quite. Vista was particularly bad. But the trend is very much a grinding enshitification.

These prediction markets are actually just insider trading markets. No one in his right mind would wander in if he didn't have insider knowledge. If you think of it that way, alls fair. Caveat emptor!

Wasn't this what Voice of America was all about, except that we held the high moral ground? Now that we've (the US under Trump) ceded the high moral ground, I guess it makes sense to get rid of it.

What if quantum computing never happens? What if BitCoin is actually worthless? What if AI eventually leads us to agents of average human intelligence? What happened to unified field theory? So much money chasing nebulous shit. All this complicated stuff that only a few actually understand, though many will gladly explain to you. As I grow old, I tire of this stuff.

Medicinal chemist here. This is such deep bullshit, I can't even figure out where to start.

I'm an older chemist. I'm seeing little to no advancement of what I do, medicinal chemistry, from AI. Translating chemistry from the literature into a real notion of how chemistry behaves isn't happening. I know, AlphaFold, right? No. AlphaFold was a beautiful application of AI, to solving a fairly bound problem using a very large, highly curated data set (the pdb). Most chemistry is a lot messier. I'll keep watching, but right now it seems that we're gonna have to keep chemists around, though we've largely decided that they will reside outside the US in the future.