If you can't read, then you are as crippled as a person who can't use the internet. 8-)

Video runs between 30 to 60 words per minute. Even if it is accelerated it is only about twice that. It goes by the speed people can hear.

Reading goes by the speed people can see, which can be much faster. Forget the old saying that 30 fps is max, that is wrong. Tests show that the human eye, in good lighting, can see text projected for only 1/10000 of a second. With a little practice, people can read hundreds of words per minute. I, myself, was tested at 1500 words per minute with 80% comprehension, although I slow down a bit for technical stuff.

Being stuck with videos is like being stuck with an old telephone modem, you know the ones that made a terrible sound... 8-)

Because this type of action is normal when a "sudden" change occurs. There is a time delay and then a "reaction" shows up, but too much. Then a reaction to that shows up and it continues until the swings damp out. Lots of things in a civilization seem to work that way...

It is accepted practice to hire people to prepair canvas (or what is used) and paint backgrounds, and has been since the Middle Ages. So maybe having an AI do that is acceptable?

Don't assume the AI is perfect, at least some people can tell the difference. And it seems like some "creators" are intentionally putting in mistakes.

Just because something is on a computer does not make iot perfect, I make my living fixing such stuff...

Good one. 8-)

Not really. Art is a form of communication and if it fails to communicate anything, then it fails as art. Even if the creator claims it is art.

And the current chat AI is more like a copy machine, although it is not totally impossible that it might make art someday.

By the way, the proper designation is "Artificial Stupid" (AS), sometimes written as "Artificial Stupid System" 8-)

We do not have any deterministic mechanisms. We try to make electronic computers as deterministic as we can, because they usually crash immediatly if not. But the slightest influence from random occurrances can cause random behaviour. In fact, many programs, including the current chat AI, have gone to great lengths to inject a small amount of randomnes for "creativity".

So most of the arguments, here, particularly the ones assuming a True/False answer, are purest male bovine solid waste. 8-)

And, if all of the hopes for AI / Slaves come true, you would still not want one driving your car.

Very interesting. And yes, we were talking a different language. 8-)

But the axes, that we used, are orthogonal to the ones listed in the article. So the systems are independent.

Lawful Good might be just as harmful, if it makes mistakes.

And yes, computer programs -can- make mistakes. Just in case some think not... 8-}

About damn time... 8-)

Now that's the way, be clear and don't assume other people will understand subtlety. 8-)

To paraphrase an old saying:
Adding an AI to a late software project will only make it later.

Also, when working with an AI, you are depending on the work of a "three year old child".

This stuff does happen in real life, but the corp usually covers it up to prevent drop in the share prices... ;-)

To do the experiment, to prove the concept, they only need a few cells. So that sounds about right.

Experiments are usually done on small scale. It sounds like you are complaining because they did an experiment instead of a manufacturing run.

Best to do things a step at a time, that way the disasters are much smaller... 8-)