Comment Qt is pretty simple.... (Score 2, Interesting) 135
Comment Re:The missing piece (Score 1) 303
Comment Re:Creative destruction (Score 2, Informative) 324
Comment Re:Presumed guilty (Score 1) 367
Comment Re:Palm Pre (Score 1) 154
Comment Re:Ridiculously complicated solution! (Score 1) 323
Submission + - Subversion is pointles - Linus said (blogspot.com)
- "Subversion used to say CVS done right: with that slogan there is nowhere you can go. There is no way to do cvs right"
- "If you like using cvs, you should be in some kind of mental institution or somewhere else"
- "Get rid of perforce, it is sad, but it is so, so true"
He just talked wonders about his great version control system (GIT), which he said he "wrote in a couple of weeks". Well, I believe it is true: we wrote it in two weeks, and it only took two years to make it usable for the rest of the world...
But it seems Linus was all about strong opinions that day: "not everybody can write something right the first time, just me".
Well, if you want to watch Linus being more rude than ever, find the whole story here
Journal Journal: How to bring mainframers into the 21st century? 8
I've recently been tasked with leading the integration effort for a large systems implementation here at work, and am facing a challenge more daunting than any mere technical obstacle; how does one best get hardcore old-school programmers to embrace a new way of integrating our applications?
Submission + - World's smallest hardware firewall?
Submission + - A Windows-Based Packaging Mechanism
There are areas that I'm personally not familiar with, and while I have done some research I would like the opinions of Slashdotters on some others. While at first I intend to set it up so that WinLibre (and I) run only one repository, I am curious as to how this sort of tool could be most useful to network administrators. Customizable repositories will be available; the code will be under the GPL, after all, so it'd be a little hard for them not to be available.
I'm also interested in the ideas of those who might be in a position to roll together packages. I intend to package a number of open-source language interpreters with the core software to allow special pre- and post-install scripts, as well as removal scripts. C#Script, Perl, and Python are definites, as is a Cygwin sh interpreter. We will have some program requirements — chief among them that no registry changes may be made by the program — but some of them, I fear, will require some flexibility; some programs really do require a way to edit the registry, for example, and I am considering offering some sort of tracked way to make registry changes so they can be rolled back on uninstallation of the program.
I'd love to hear what Slashdotters think of this. Think of it as a wishlist, but you don't get any damn ponies.
Ed Ropple (FishWithAHammer)"
Submission + - New Zealand rejects Office for Macs.
Submission + - Is parallel programming just too hard?
Since this discussion has been going on for over a decade with little progress in terms of widespread change, one has to ask is parallel programming just too difficult for most programmers? Are the tools inadequate or perhaps is it that it is very difficult to think about parallel systems. Maybe it is a fundamental human limit. Will we really see progress in the next 10 years that matches the progress of the silicon?
Submission + - Storing Music for Personal Use Online is Illegal