Comment Don't you understand yet ? (Score 3, Insightful) 21
Money buys you the justice that you want.
Money buys you the justice that you want.
So what's the basis of the lawsuit against Disney? There's no damages, so equitable relief? Of what?
They want to use footage from Steamboat Willie and do not want to be sued for breach of copyright. Although this fell out of copyright last year and entered public domain the Mouse is sufficiently litigious that they have a fear that they might be sued -- a reasonable fear IMHO. Thus the request for clarification which Disney would not give. Thus going to court is their only option.
That Disney refused to answer suggests to me that they know that they would lose any attempt to sue for breach of copyright but they are going to make it as hard & expensive as possible for anyone to use Steamboat Willie -- typical large corporation behaviour (that of a bully).
Makes you wonder why a supposed lawyer would ask such a stupid question.
It is called a letter before action. The courts like it if you have tried to come to an agreement before going to court and, potentially, wasting their time on something that did not need to be litigated.
but give the guy a break. This is hardly the first new product demo to have failed. Maybe they should have had the foresight to run it over a private network and not the center's WiFi, but knowing what will happen in the real world is very hard to get right.
I have never used an AI to write code. The code that I write I understand and am able to document.
shut down their nuclear power plants before the end of their originally planned decommission date.
The shut down their plants as a result of the scare of the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident, this is now seen as a mistake but at the time the big worry was escaping radiation.
please continue to reduce use of coal in spite of some other countries trying to burn more. Future generations will thank you.
that AI would never be used in war or to kill humans ? It was not very long ago.
$1million donation dinner. This ruling will then be toast thanks to an executive order a week afterwards.
When you do an update, you may be replacing files that are in-use, e.g., system libraries. On Unix, you can do this - programs already running continue to use the old library on disk whose reference was deleted, while new programs will use the updated library. However this can lead to issues since now you can have programs with a library mismatch - one program is using an old version of the library, while another program is using the newer version, so you need to restart the programs using it. And sometimes this can lead to bigger problems like file corruption if the file format changed and programs are using a mix of the and new libraries.
No, that is not how it works, Shared Object files (.so) have
version numbers in the name. When you update you install a new file with a
different name. Example: my shell (on Debian Trixie) uses
You can have several different versions of the same library installed at the same time, programs use the one with the same major number that they were compiled against. When no more programs depend on an installed library file the package manager will get rid of it.
A trimmed example on my machine:
$ ls -l
lr-------- 1 addw addw 64 Aug 19 23:08 7fb34e2b5000-7fb34e2c4000 ->
$ cd
$ ls -l libtinfo.*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 323142 Mar 6 16:01 libtinfo.a
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Mar 6 16:01 libtinfo.so -> libtinfo.so.6
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Mar 6 16:01 libtinfo.so.6 -> libtinfo.so.6.5
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 220464 Mar 6 16:01 libtinfo.so.6.5
There have long been all manner of reasons for cost increases (raw materials; labour charges; transport costs;
"Supply chain absorbing cost increases" are weasel words used by politicians to convince the public that things will not be so bad. "Efficiencies will be made" is another - over the long term this is false.
You might have mail.