Comment Re:Wrong Model (Score 2) 76
That's why most solar installations in California now have batteries so they can store solar PV energy and avoid buying or selling from the grid.
That's why most solar installations in California now have batteries so they can store solar PV energy and avoid buying or selling from the grid.
The US electric grid is based on large generating plants connected by long distance transmission lines. This was the only feasible way to set up the grid when all you had were large generators.
However, with the rise of solar (home and commercial) and battery storage, it is possible to organize the grid as a network of small distributed generators. This reduces the need for long distance transmission and makes the grid more resilient since there are many more sources of energy and the failure of one is insignificant.
California is a good example where a network of home batteries has prevented four major outages this year and was called into use about 15 times to supplement large generators.
A problem is that power companies don't make profits from small scale generation and storage. It actually costs them. Power companies would rather invest in large generating plants and long distance transmission where they get a guaranteed return on investment and well as controlling the market so they can charge high prices.
Basing a person's credit score on credit usage rather than payment history is part of the system's bullshit.
Sort of, but lenders aren't looking for people who have good financial sense.
Lenders are looking for people who will borrow a lot of money, then continue paying on that loan. Which is not the same thing as having financial sense.
Which is pants on head retarded.
Both from a moral level, keeping people in debt to ensure they're indentured to someone and from a business perspective as it's a imperial shitton (about 1.8 Metric fuckloads) of risk. In case you don't remember the last time the banks over-leveraged on risky customers, it was only 2008, there was a massive collapse we're still feeling the effects of.
I'm glad my country doesn't have anything of the sort. Experian are trying to "sell" their credit score system but no-one is buying. When you apply for credit here (I.E. home or car loan) your existing credit obligations including potential ones (like a credit card or phone contract) are listed as risks and detract from the amount you can borrow.
Compare the market caps though, Nvidia and Intel are not on the same order of magnitude.
I don't think there is much a of frenemy relationship really to speak of.
My guess is this about two things:
1) Nvidia ensuring they have or could get some access to an x86 license if AMD is somehow able to both make some kind of great leap in MIMD compute space and at the same time is able to deliver some kind of integration advantage with integration in traditional compute in memory architecture with EPYC parts.
2) Being sure they have access to some kind of FAB capacity in the event the excrement hits the fan around TSMC, and with a "partner" to whom they could dictate terms.
I think everyone is over thinking this. NVidia need to do something with that money they're drowning in and there's only so much that can be syphoned off to tax havens before everyone starts asking questions. If they kept it, they'd need to pay tax on it and we can't have that.
AMD has been outselling Intel in the DC for what, a year now or more?
No, AMD still trails Intel in the data center, both in terms of revenue and unit sales. AMD's server share was stagnating at 20% for many years despite an uptick in reputation and positive press. It's only been recently this year that AMD hit around 40% in server market share, and that's based on revenue. In terms of units, AMD's market share is lower at around 32%.
Of course, upward momentum is still with AMD, so it wouldn't be surprising to see AMD claim a majority of server market share in the near future.
What's surprised me in the processor market is AMD making inroads in the laptop space that Intel owned for decades, even when AMD were dominating on the desktop and had very strong server offerings (the Athlon 64/Opteron days, for those who's memories stretch back that far). 15% of laptops are now AMD.
So? 99.9% of laptop users will never upgrade their RAM anyways. This is a budget laptop. It doesn't need to be upgraded. It's made to do the basics, like a Chromebook. For someone on a tech website, you're certainly completely out of touch with technology needs.
Upgrading budget laptops is how you save.
I have a cheap Asus gaming laptop for travel. It cost me £550 and most of that was for the RTX3050. I was able to pop the back off, add in another 8 GB of RAM, doubling the original and replace the 512 GB SSD with a faster 1TB for less than £100, the next model up that had the same amount of RAM was over £200 more expensive (but it did have a 3060 to be fair).
A lot of budget laptops are deliberately underspec'd to force people afraid to upgrade to buying a far more expensive laptop.
All of this is a moot point anyway, Apple have been hostile to upgrades and repairs for decades, they already spend extra to solder in the hard drives and ram modules. Also anyone who didn't predict that they'd be killing off the Mac line for phone based ones? Anyone still denying that? Mac OS being killed off is next.
It's "so complicated" because with almost any other laptop manufacturer you can add RAM after the fact, and not have to upgrade everything else in the system that you don't need upgraded just to get more RAM.
The people who upgrade ram in their laptops are probably like 1% of the total market. Most are bought by corps or individuals who treat them as an appliance.
That's still 3 million people of the ext. 300 million laptops that get sold each year.
And I'm willing to bet a lot of people are like me who buy a lower spec'd model where I can upgrade the RAM and SSD on the cheap saving a hundred quid off the more expensive one.
However that's besides the point, Apple have been openly hostile to people who want to upgrade (and consumers in general) for years. Plenty of other manufacturers to choose from though.
"Smart" devices were ALWAYS a vector for advertising. First it was a vector for data collection to better target ads, now it's just blatant advertising all the time. I've shied away from smart devices whenever possible, and if I'm forced to buy a smart device to replace a defective device I don't enable the network. "But you're missing out on features, man!" Yeah, I'm missing out on yet another advertising and propaganda channel. Boo hoo.
Smart devices were *NEVER* about adding features for the end user. It was always, and always will be, about advertising. Don't fall for it. Don't support it.
As a side effect, they're going to become a huge vector for malware.
A fridge will last for a decade or more, they'll stop doing software updates after 7 years maximum, maybe even as low as 2. In fact some may never receive a software update.
Pi-hole.
They'll just put in defences they will put in place to prevent it.
"Your fridge will shut down in 20 hours unless we're able to reach the Enrichment server" which is also the advertising server.
What needs to happen is laws need to be passed making this shit illegal. There's a reason they're starting in the US, even before their government was more corrupt that all the other tin pot dictatorships put together, there were enough people who were irrationally afraid of competent governance that they'd willingly prevent laws against this kind of thing.
I can see no reason a fridge should ever need to be connected to the internet.
I kind of want my refrigerator to send me a notification if some idiot leaves the door open. I'm just not willing to pay extra for that feature.
All that does is requires a beeper.
The idiots who leave it open are the kind that want these beepers removed because they find them annoying (erm... it's kind of the point, to get your attention). They're the same kind of people who openly invite being bombarded with ads because they think "they're not affected by them" which is evidenced by the amount of branded crap they don't need strewn around their dwelling.
I want my fridge to reliably keep things cold. Efficiently would be nice, doing so without releasing harmful chemicals would just be a bonus the way things are going.
Consumers need to reject it. Return the fridge if an update brings ads.
In countries with stronger consumer rights there is little question that this kind of enshittification would be a refund issue. It fundamentally changes the product, intrudes into your private space with unwanted and obnoxious ads, and it cannot be repaired.
Consumers don't get a choice.
They don't give a shit either. Try finding a non "smart" TV in the UK because you just want a TV that doesn't have a long boot time or requires network connectivity as you simply want to use it as a display unit for other devices.
People need to petition to make laws to make this kind of shit well and truly illegal. That is unlikely to happen in the US however as making this illegal is "government overreach" and being bombarded with advertisements is "freeze peach". Not likely to fly in the UK though. At least not yet, who knows what will happen after the 3rd glorious decade of total law enforcement thanks to Fuhrer Farage.
It's nothing like that.
They want to have the narrative that "leftists are violent!!!" because they killed Charlie Kirk. Never mind the other deaths like January 6, George Floyd, etc.
Never mind the fact that when the right spews hate, they claim censorship when platforms start to remove their posts.
The whole point is to say the left needs to be censored and everything. Ever notice how many people are being cancelled because of their less than complimentary comments about Charlie Kirk?
Double standards and all - if it's your speech been censored, then cry free speech. If it's someone you don't like, censor away!
They want Steam, Discord, etc. to start deplatforming all those leftists.
It's gotten so far that some Republicans are trying to back away because they realize that those laws being used to censor "the left" could easily be used to censor them for the exact same reason. The big fun being to see how the Supreme Court will allow the censorship but then twist themselves into knots trying to deny the same rights if a (D) gets to be President.
That is a good post except for one thing.
Charlie Kirk's killer isn't "left". He grew up in a very republican household, very much "left" hating MAGA. Jimmy Kimmel has been cancelled for saying what everyone knows. Tyler Robinson wasn't some Leftist, he was one of them, a MAGA. At the very best you have a very conservative upbringing being a key part of radicalisation.
Trump and the Republicans are going to try as hard as they can to suppress that and push the narrative that it's the "left". This will involve even greater abuses of power. Anyone want to take bets that witnesses will be reading prepared statements for the press, no questions permitted in case they accidentally go off script and that the court proceedings will be held behind closed doors. No access to any media that might deviate from the narrative. I'd go as far to suspect that a fake confession indicating support for MAGAs favourite hates will be created (if it has not already). Definitely no media access to the accused.
This is going to be a farce and the more people who allow it, the harder it will hit everyone including them (and they'll whine that they never expected the leopard to eat their face).
And of course the MAGA faithful don't want to see this, so they attempt to suppress it.
I have to wonder, when does it finally dawn on some people that they're on the wrong side of history? I guess for some the realisation never comes, I'm willing to bet some died in the wool German and Italian fascists went to their graves still believing they made the right choice supporting Hitler and Mussolini long after their downfalls.
China is also dumping excess production on the rest of the world. Lots of people have access to good cars at good prices.
I'd love to see these come to the US but our protectionist policies only allow us to buy expensive sub-standard EVs from US manufacturers.
These cars are available in Mexico (and maybe soon Canada). I'd love to buy one and import it to the US as a used car at a much lower tariff.
Good point. It drives me crazy too.
Adding extra zeros is just hype.
Looks like the biggest drop is from reporting student loan delinquencies. Biden's effort to reduce student loan debt has ended.
Instead of free/low cost education like much of the rest of the "civilized" world, the US puts everyone in perpetual penury with massive student loan debt so they have to keep slaving for much of their lives.
"Only a brain-damaged operating system would support task switching and not make the simple next step of supporting multitasking." -- George McFry